Vaux



What apparent to me, there's lots of emotive discussions around development in Sunderland, both positive and negative viewpoints.
I think it's good people take an active interest in Sunderland. It shows despite all inhibitory forces and negativity, people will always stand up and care about their own city!
 
What apparent to me, there's lots of emotive discussions around development in Sunderland, both positive and negative viewpoints.
I think it's good people take an active interest in Sunderland. It shows despite all inhibitory forces and negativity, people will always stand up and care about their own city!
Apart from @Boris Bear he just says move. Sounds like a council member tbh
 
What apparent to me, there's lots of emotive discussions around development in Sunderland, both positive and negative viewpoints.
I think it's good people take an active interest in Sunderland. It shows despite all inhibitory forces and negativity, people will always stand up and care about their own city!
I think some people just like a good moan or are really f***ing thick?

People complaining about why we can't be more like London ffs

Apart from @Boris Bear he just says move. Sounds like a council member tbh
Which council member do I sound like ?
 
Yes it is wrong.

My loose understanding is that about £20million of their 'investment' is in the transfer of land assets to Siglion (the partnership between the council, Carillion and Igloo)....another £10million comes in cash to finance the start of the Vaux build. Further financing will come from the sale of annuities to private investors but to encourage this investment the council have had to put their cock on the block to get things moving. Once Vaux is built, seaburn is built and chapelgarth is built the council should see a positive return on their investment in financial terms alone, not to mention that Sunderland should be better off for it.

Should the council have demanded that they give their own design input to Building 1 at Vaux or should they let the professionals (who have been doing this sort of thing for years) get on with it? It is a fine balance, but on balance I would say give it a chance. As the naysayers have been at pains to point out, we have world leading model makers in Sunderland but none of the models have come to fruition. Let them build it...they haven't done a bad job in Manchester or Birmingham
Apologies if I am overlooking something obvious- but what is proposed at Seaburn?

More change afoot in sunderland city centre :cool:

Logon or register to see this image
More student accomodation, just what we need
 
That's because you're complaining about bridges and roundabouts marra. Doesn't make any sense at all
So what I mean if the money that's being spent on the bridge was used to rid the 1231 of its roundabouts including the a19 roundabout. The traffic would flow quicker? By adding a bridge to the 1231 we will still be sitting at the a19 roundabout every night. Just a few minutes longer as we will get to the bottleneck quicker.
 
So what I mean if the money that's being spent on the bridge was used to rid the 1231 of its roundabouts including the a19 roundabout. The traffic would flow quicker? By adding a bridge to the 1231 we will still be sitting at the a19 roundabout every night. Just a few minutes longer as we will get to the bottleneck quicker.

Moan moan moan
 
Ha nope. Am the bloke who would ask him how he made 200k from the sale of council land
And how he sat in a meeting with the police top brass to discuss unsolved Sunderland murders when he himself was heavily involved in one.

Wahey....it's Len

How's the tinfoil hat and the failed burger bar Leonard. Told any customers to fuck off recently?
 

Back
Top