Tin Soldier
Striker
Can we get up to 100 pages of utter waffle about the great unwashed and Benitez hasn't even got as far as packing a pair of socks in his leaving case ? 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn't happen, nobody would snub 'Rafa the Gaffa'.Jairo Riedewald reportedly 'snubbed' Rafa for De Boar.
That was the first thing i though of likebut with me being a gentleman n all that
![]()
And?
This isnt a computer game finances are much more complex.
You kept a premier league wage bill while adding to it in the championship. You didnt have relegation clauses. So youll find 30m profit may have be in fact 15m profit once wages and agent fees are taken into account.
You spent 70m the season you went down. You still have players like De Jong picking up hefty wages. It isnt a case of we made 30m profit
You generate around 130m last prem season. Your wage bill is around 70m then you have transfers you are still paying for past players and additional signings you may make.
You spent 50m last summer you will be paying installments for players this summer for Ritchie Gayle and Shelvey. So it isnt a case of you made 30m you dont know that. What the sccounts show is in fact your net debt keeps increasing and will increase again with the 30m Ashley borrowed last jan.
We didn't though, in my opinion. Something like 25 players left in July/August 2016, either sold, loaned out or released.....only 13 came in the other way. Of the players who left, most were our highest earners (Coloccini, Cisse, Cabella, Townesend, Wijnaldum, Sissoko, Janmaat, Taylor etc.) with only really a few big earners left at the club (Mitrovic, Shelvey). Of the players that came in, a couple would have been on decent money (Gayle, Ritchie) but the rest (Hanley, Murphy etc.) would be on nowhere near what the players who left were. I'd be very surprised if our 16/17 wage bill was anywhere near our 15/16 one.
It's all guess work on both our parts until the accounts are published of course.
Didn't say we'd necessarily be battling relegation, just that we're not that good (as it stands). I mean, if we went off and spent a fortune on class players I might be more optimistic. But I'm not happy with our left flank, I want depth in key areas, I want a #10 and a striker. Get those and I'll be confident of safety (13th ish). I don't think we'll get all those though, so I'm expecting 14th-17th.
Because he is an arsehole?Expecting? Which teams are you currently better than. I can think of 2.
Wouldn't be surprised to see you finish around 15th, but why do you 'expect' to finish outside the drop zone at the minute. Not 'hoping', but 'expecting'.
Love the way he finished it off with losing their league championship winning managerFuture "in serious doubt" according to Martin Hardy, who recently wrote a book about Benitez, in today's Independent:
You must be logged on to see external links
Expecting? Which teams are you currently better than. I can think of 2.
Wouldn't be surprised to see you finish around 15th, but why do you 'expect' to finish outside the drop zone at the minute. Not 'hoping', but 'expecting'.
Expecting? Which teams are you currently better than. I can think of 2.
Wouldn't be surprised to see you finish around 15th, but why do you 'expect' to finish outside the drop zone at the minute. Not 'hoping', but 'expecting'.
Krul
Elliot
Dummet
Yedlin
Mbemba
Clark
Anita
Colback
Shelvey
Ritchie
Diame
Perez
Atsu
Goufrann
Mitrovic
Perez
Gayle
All on premier league wages so your wage bill will still be too high.
Anita has left, Gouffran is out of contract. The likes of Elliott and Dummett are earning peanuts and of the others, none were earning the big money (£70k plus) the likes of Colocinni, Cisse etc were earning.
We'll see, but I'd be very surprised if our 16/17 wage bill is anywhere near what it was the previous year.
Anita has left, Gouffran is out of contract. The likes of Elliott and Dummett are earning peanuts and of the others, none were earning the big money (£70k plus) the likes of Colocinni, Cisse etc were earning.
We'll see, but I'd be very surprised if our 16/17 wage bill is anywhere near what it was the previous year.
How many of them are back and still under contract with no prospect of being sold?I wonder if the players out on loan had their wages paid for by the loaning club, or a portion of it at least? That would dramatically reduce our wage bill too, right? Krul, Saivet, Riviere, De Jong, Toney, Armstrong, and so on
Future "in serious doubt" according to Martin Hardy, who recently wrote a book about Benitez, in today's Independent:
You must be logged on to see external links
None.How many of them are back and still under contract with no prospect of being sold?
We've been over these points. A lot.Crediting Benitez with "Profit"? Really?
How much credit should he get that the club received over £70m on Sissoko, Wijnaldum & Townsend. The transfer net is kind to Benitez simply due to those 3 big sales, yet he went and spent £57m on transfer fees alone and is still left with a squad short on premiership quality. He then demanded more back in Jan, and threw his toys out of the pram when more funds weren't delivered. A similar pattern seems to be emerging again.
Offset the net spend too, with the fact Benitez helped take Newcastle down. He failed in his original remit of "saving them". 10 points in his opening 9 games, and bang. Relegated. Those 9 games included the 3 relegation rivals, in which he failed to beat any of them. 1 point adrift of us with a game in hand, and the easier run in. He failed, despite the adoration after that meaningless Spurs victory.
He's a decent manager, but the hysteria over him is f***ing hilarious. I genuinely wouldn't want him anywhere Sunderland
We've been over these points. A lot.
And none of my comments are disputable. Just fact![]()