• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Who's still backing Moyes?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thank you for that.
I like the owner, defended him many times, but he did a lot of mistakes.
I don't like the people involved with the pathetic summer business (Moyes, Bain) and Jack Rodwell.
We're joint bottom under a manager who failed at his last two jobs. Not much to be excited about.

Depends how you define failure.

Did well late on in the season.

Tin hat on but I think he's better than Jones, Manquillo and Love (Love still young tho so time to improve).

On reflection I'm putting that one in the Moyes mistake column.
 

Did well late on in the season.

Tin hat on but I think he's better than Jones, Manquillo and Love (Love still young tho so time to improve).

Aye fair point. I think he is better than Love and Manquillo like but Jones probably shades it even though he is also a bit crap
 
We are losing games because most our players aren't very good. Poyet tried to make us hard to beat and we seemed to get loads of draws with him but he didn't work out for us in the end.

Unsure what Defoe's goals have to do with out?

Tbh you come across as someone who has been brainwashed into Ellis Short into thinking sacking a manager every season is the way forward.



With a stronger squad...



Interesting.
Not at all, I've been saying for a long time the reason we are in this financial situation is we keep changing our managers

In this case though I don't believe Moyes is showing much to take us forward.

The Defoe point us relevant as we need to make sure we are hard to beat. If we do his goals will warn points. At the minute they are just consultations
 
Although his signings have been borderline SHOCKING, who do you even try and replace him with?

His substitutions baffle me as well
 
The absolute inability to compete in a competition you chose to be in.

If he failed at Man Utd then so has Mourinho, thus far. (He even had a worse record than Moyes after 16 games, despite spending a zillion pounds)

Now he is at Sunderland, and our aim (and his task) is to finish 17th. He is failing at the moment, but only just.
 
Last edited:
I'm backing Moyes, with what he has to work with it's a miracle we are not beating the 11points record.

Can be to negative sometimes for me but overall best on offer.
 
If he failed at Man Utd then so has Mourinho, thus far. (He even had a worse record than Moyes after 16 games, despite spending a zillion pounds)

Now he is at Sunderland, and our aim (and his task) is to finish 17th. He is failing at the moment, but only just.


Nice edit to insert utd facts, I dont give a shit about utd or mourinho, what they do has no bearing on us, or your claim that we as a club aim for 17th.
 
Nice edit to insert utd facts, I dont give a shit about utd or mourinho, what they do has no bearing on us, or your claim that we as a club aim for 17th.

Well someone said he'd failed at man utd, so i asked for a definition of failure and you commented. Bit weird given you then say dont give a shit about man utd. You've probably just made a mistake so no harm done.

We do aim to finish 17th like, shame.
 
Well someone said he'd failed at man utd, so i asked for a definition of failure and you commented. Bit weird given you then say dont give a shit about man utd. You've probably just made a mistake so no harm done.

We do aim to finish 17th like, shame.

I commented on a definition in the context of who backs moyes, the only relevance therefore is how he is performing here.

If you choose to discuss his success relative to mourinho at utd then that is up to you, im not interested in why you made the original point, I discussed it only in relation to SAFC.

You answered accordingly (saying our aim is 17th), and then edited it to insert man utd drivel.

So actually you made the mistake, perhaps you should have mentioned it in your edit.
 
I commented on a definition in the context of who backs moyes, the only relevance therefore is how he is performing here.

If you choose to discuss his success relative to mourinho at utd then that is up to you, im not interested in why you made the original point, I discussed it only in relation to SAFC.

You answered accordingly (saying our aim is 17th), and then edited it to insert man utd drivel.

So actually you made the mistake, perhaps you should have mentioned it in your edit.

Someone said he failed in his last two jobs (one of which was man utd). I asked for definition of failure. You then joined the discussion. A discussion which was about his previous jobs. Fair play, you just jumped in without thinking but we can move on.

*I added the stats to back up the argument regarding how failure in his previous jobs was defined, as that was the topic being discussed.
 
Remind us who blew what little budget we had on Man U reserves, out of contract has beens and African punts?


Briefly and only a loan. Stayed up. What's your point?

Fact is the Khazri/Kone/Kirchoff signings were the best signings we've made for many a long year.

He was f***ing shite mate.
 
Briefly and only a loan. Stayed up. What's your point?

Fact is the Khazri/Kone/Kirchoff signings were the best signings we've made for many a long year.

You made a remark suggesting Moyes brings in poor players and plays them out of position by saying Allardyce doesnt do that. I simply provided proof he did.

Kone was a superb signing, as was Kirchhoff (although we clearly got a bit lucky regarding his fitness, hence he was so cheap).

I never rated Khazri. Barring the odd moment he was a plodder who basically put in a shift.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top