• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Adam Johnson Trial Verdict

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think Johnson is clearly a selfish individual who is an absolute disgrace. I have absolutely no sympathy for him. But I believe the other party involved is also accountable for their actions. She was aware that Johnson was in a relationship and had a child. Sorry but I don't subscribe to the 'poor young lass' view
Then you are a border line nonce facilitator and i hope you dont have anything to do with young people.
 

Was aware of the charges. We knew that anyway.

In much the same way they would have been appraised of the Bramble, Cattermole, Bendtner and Sessegon incidents. She's the first one there as soon as we have someone arrested. This latest statement changes nothing. It's raised the level of hysteria somewhat mind.

The problems remains the same, there are far too many imponderables and unknowns to make any meaningful judgement.
 
but truth of the matter is kauto in the times we live in, moving on won't be happening in the near future, until the media gets is side of beef to chew slowly they will continue, to dig the dirt, what is done is done, but its just plain wrong and i can't and won't defend it

This is unpopular mate, but I'd lock all threads on the issue until things have calmed down. For me, the media can fuck off
 
The police have just said that the club were told the full extent of the allegations and people are reading too much into it.

But Detective Inspector Aelfwynn Sampson, of Durham Police, told BBC News that after the player was arrested a year ago, she told club bosses that sexual activity had taken place and that Johnson had messaged the girl.

Read more:
Follow us: Invalid/outdated Link Removed | Invalid/outdated Link Removed
 
We'll see. To some extent it's always pointless speculating what sentence a judge will give because if you have one who thinks that the fact he's a premier league footballer and he only pleaded at the last second to the two, and showed contempt in court etc. then maybe yes, 5 years. Equally, you get a judge who takes the age/ non sex as more salient and maybe you're talking 2 1/2 - and since none of us know what type of sentencer the judge is like who knows.

All I'd say is looking at similar sentences it would be pretty unusual for it to be more than 4 years, imo.
One of the offences is classed as category 1. It has a 5 years starting point on it. Grooming has an 18 months starting point.
 
As soon as he pleaded guilty he was toxic and after lying and stringing the club along for nearly a year his position was completely untenable.

However, I maintain an ordinary bloke on the street wouldn't have been given a custodial sentence for those charges alone.

Also Johnson had been maintaining that he was not guilty of all charges.
Johnson and the way he groomed this poor lass, is not comparable to an ordinary bloke.
 
No you don't. You want a meeting with the board.

Personally I'm happy to move on. I do however acknowledge there is a section of fans who have legitimate questions and a forum would be good for that.
 
In law not a paedophile, does that mean I'm defending him no, but it means legally he's not a paedophile

Do you think the same when some middle class twat gets talking to a '15 year old' online and gets busted by someone like Dark Justice or Old Bill pretending to be a girl, and do you post on their Facebook page or on the internet saying that they aren't technically a 'Paedo'? Why do press semantics, and that fact he plays for SAFC matter, the guy's been a twat and abused his position to get his kicks. End of.
 
But Detective Inspector Aelfwynn Sampson, of Durham Police, told BBC News that after the player was arrested a year ago, she told club bosses that sexual activity had taken place and that Johnson had messaged the girl.

Read more:
Follow us: Invalid/outdated Link Removed | Invalid/outdated Link Removed

In that case she should be sacked because he was only under suspicion at that time.

She told the club what he was accused of nothing more, don't even need to read the link.
 
Do you think the same when some middle class twat gets talking to a '15 year old' online and gets busted by someone like Dark Justice or Old Bill pretending to be a girl, and do you post on their Facebook page or on the internet saying that they aren't technically a 'Paedo' so cut him some slack? Why do press semantics matter, the guy's been a twat and abused his position. End of.
Did you see the bit where I said I wasn't defending him?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top