Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Might have summit to do with your minging avataryeah i I started a johnson thread earlier i thought this will give me the longest thread ever and all the likes i could dream of - all gone up in smoke!
Usually i can abide your posts but you have gone on this strange Lauder like mission to be the biggest voice in argument against the club....yes i feel the statement was placatory but posting constantly isn't going to help, if anything it's making you look like a bit of an obsessive dick for constantly going on about it, it's an emotive subject i get it but there is only one victim in this case, it's not SAFC and it's certainly not you.That's utter drivel. For many it's a chance to constantly defend the club.
with a brolly?Wally
The club haven't denied it have they? If it was trap fabrication they would have.
It's got to do with the fact people are believing what Johnson said and backing it up with the fact his barrister supported him. When in fact that happens all of the time but it doesn't make it true.That has fuck all to do with this though.
If that's shits deserved then what's the problem?
Imagine waiting 2-3 weeks to go to prison! What would you do in that time?
The PFA held talks with SAFC and agreed with the way Sunderland were dealing with the case.
with a teacher,doctor,policeman up for them charges there's a major safeguarding issue that can't be overcome. If a factory worker (for instance) got hit with them charges they couldn't suspend him while the case is ongoing as there's no safeguarding issue in that environment. As per the clubs statement they Did a safeguarding review before they lifted his suspension which means he'd have no interaction with fans and it was agreed by his legal team and the PFA.You're just completely wrong, there. Why would it be okay to pay a contract off but not suspend with pay? What would happen to a teacher, a doctor, a policeman up for those allegations?
Suspend with pay would be the norm.
I agree. It loos like legal cacbabble to try and negate responsibility.
Simple question to my football club. Did you know that Johnson had groomed and kissed a child when you met with him and his legal brief last year?
It's got to do with the fact people are believing what Johnson said and backing it up with the fact his barrister supported him. When in fact that happens all of the time but it doesn't make it true.
Be sorting out a flight to a country that has no extradition agreement with the UK?
Should they answer each and every crackpot allegation made by a proven liar and sex-offender? They've said enough IMO, people will never be satisfied anyway.I agree. It loos like legal cacbabble to try and negate responsibility.
Simple question to my football club. Did you know that Johnson had groomed and kissed a child when you met with him and his legal brief last year?
Maybe they don't feel the need to, I've already said I don't know why they aren't you seem though to be ignoring that I've said that I know from first hand experience that witnesses lie and barristers are very clever at twisting the truth to suit their argument.The club haven't denied it have they? If it was trap fabrication they would have.
Adam Johnson's response:You must be logged on to see media items
That has fuck all to do with this though.
with a teacher,doctor,policeman up for them charges there's a major safeguarding issue that can't be overcome. If a factory worker (for instance) got hit with them charges they couldn't suspend him while the case is ongoing as there's no safeguarding issue in that environment. As per the clubs statement they Did a safeguarding review before they lifted his suspension which means he'd have no interaction with fans and it was agreed by his legal team and the PFA.
Yep and I've seen hundreds give evidence under oath...he was under oath and the club have not denied it.... of course I believe him.