OohBaldyBally
Striker
You mean the tiny one next to the right cheek of the 1st ghost?
!
Yes mate, never spotted that before.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean the tiny one next to the right cheek of the 1st ghost?
!
I'm sure I read or saw something that ruled out double exposure for this one....I'm going to have a search about for it
Isn't it, I change my view on it all the time, sure it could be an accident but there's just something not right at all, especially when you consider the main suspects dad is in the FBI.
Double exposure, piece of piss
Did anyone ask why a ghost would bother dressing up like a twat?
I've put some links in the post. I don't know how you'd rule it out to be honest.....!!
How do you rule out a double exposure? It's so clearly a fake
This photo was in a book I had in the 70's called Ghosts ghouls and monsters. I was a bairn and it put the shits right up me. Used to dread waking up in Durham cathedral after I read about the ghost in there. Cracking thread like...Logon or register to see this image
This is an old photo I first saw in the 80's
You cannot rule out double exposure. It just can't be doneI'm sure I read or saw something that ruled out double exposure for this one....I'm going to have a search about for it
http://www.castleofspirits.com/hoodmonk.html
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=17930883
http://www.paranormalhaze.com/10-famous-ghost-pictures-and-their-story/
I think that's the one they are saying is the airman.That's the ghostly face.There isn't 2.
Yeah it's gruesome, I was going to post it on here but I think it's a bit too far for even the SMB, saying that it's probably not as bad as the Catacombs photo.Have you seen some of the other pictures? The second autopsy the family had done found that he died from blunt force trauma.
Art with a body count?What is it that you think he did wrong?
There is no way of proving a piece of film hasn't been double exposed as far as I'm awareThat's one of the few "ghost photos" experts haven't found any tampering with, no double exposure or anything. Both negative and prints have allegedly been checked.
Kevin carters guilt is a matter of debate ... At the point of this photos execution no doubt , no conscience , no doubts ... Just exploitationI have read that four months after he took the photograph he committed suicide due to an overwhelming sense of guilt and drug dependence.
No mat-erial witnesses? The police should be carpetted imo. Didn't even have a lino-up. Rug justiceLoads of them seem to be in America, You read about the Kendrick Johnson case?
Do you believe in ghosts.....? I was just wondering. I do but not because of the photos - because of family members who have seen things and they would not have a reason to lie about it. But I suppose I wouldn't believe 100% unless I saw something myself, which as yet I have not.There is no way of proving a piece of film hasn't been double exposed as far as I'm aware
So you wouldn't think that you might just have had a psychotic episode?Do you believe in ghosts.....? I was just wondering. I do but not because of the photos - because of family members who have seen things and they would not have a reason to lie about it. But I suppose I wouldn't believe 100% unless I saw something myself, which as yet I have not.
It's got bugger all to do with that photoDo you believe in ghosts.....? I was just wondering. I do but not because of the photos - because of family members who have seen things and they would not have a reason to lie about it. But I suppose I wouldn't believe 100% unless I saw something myself, which as yet I have not.
I might do aye, but until it happened and depending on the circumstances you wouldn't know what you'd think though.So you wouldn't think that you might just have had a psychotic episode?
Logon or register to see this image