I am not against players being paid but I played in an era where one player got paid; the pro.
Yes there were some poor pros but some lifted their clubs massively and left a legacy for years after they left. I am thinking of Derek Parry at Horden and Jimmy Adams at Eppleton.
They attracted good, unpaid, players and loads of kids, some of whom went on to be top cricketers.
The sorry fact nowadays is that very ordinary players are demanding money.
Yes, it is up to the clubs whether they pay them. If your club can sustain this AND maintain your ground AND run a progressive junior section then BRILLIANT, you've cracked it.
Unfortunately there are clubs struggling and clubs folding due to past financial mismanagement, and that is sad.
I love all forms of cricket but my heart is with local club cricket. All test players start there.
When club members are working hard to raise funds to provide cricket for all, some of the "paid" players are conspicuous by there absence.
When clubs start paying players to finish mid-table, I shake my head.
If an extra, good, player makes the difference between finishing second or first, then, again, I understand this. However, to my knowledge, there is no monetary reward for winning leagues in North East cricket.
Good luck to all clubs this season. Please do not mortgage the future of your club.
Several clubs, in recent years, have fallen down the leagues, but some have bounced back even stronger.
As for admission, clubs used to charge for cup ties. Why can't we do this again, even if it just covers the cost of Umpires ?
I watch local football and rugby in the winter and pay anything from £3-£10 for admission, for 80-90 minutes of entertainment.
Even night cup ties give you 2-3 hours.
Some clubs run a raffle of some kind and true sport lovers are more than willing to buy tickets in lieu of admission charges.