Bri said:
↑
Yea, pretty much says what I think.
This is a quote from Boycott
"Yes Kevin was awkward, difficult, different and at times his own worst enemy. But his record and his performances do not deserve a character assassination."
Ok fair enough, but can you please explain why Prior and other good England players deserve a character assassination by KP? It works both ways.
It's not right.
tbh, I've heard nothing that I wouldn't expect to see anywhere except. I'm sure players form little groups in every dressing room, when those groups they become cliques it becomes counter-productive and the 'leadership' needs to get a grip. Strauss didn't apparently because he was on the way out and Cook hasn't and flower didn't.
As for the 'tweets'. I see nothing wrong with tweeting to people/friends in the opposition just as I see nothing wrong that in the old days players would meet up after a match and have a drink and have a natter. I would see something wrong if KP passed on tactical plans, he says he didn't and it must be hard to do that in 140 characters anyway.
This dossier interests me too. It's the kind of thing you get asked to do sometimes when you want to get rid of someone but you don't have a solid reason.
Manager: I want to get rid of X
Higher Manager: Why, is he playing badly?
Manager: Not really.
Higher Manager: Does he refuse to do his job?
Manager: Not really.
Higher Manager: Then why?
Manager: Well, he's a bad influence.
Higher Manager: In what way?
Manager: Well, he looks out of the window.
Higher Manager: But he is one of our better players though, right?
Manager: Yea, but....
Higher Manager: I tell you want, you write down everything tha happens and we'll see.
To me it smacks of someone wanting to get rid but not having a good reason to do it.