Court ruling due today. This will affect many other things - anywhere where men and women are subject to different cost scales (pension, health cover, life cover, etc). Personally I can't see how it's discrimination. If there is reliable data showing that Category A is higher risk than Category B, it shouldn't matter what actually determines the categories - age, sex, height, being called Kevin vs. being called something else, punks vs skins, IQ, innies vs. outies, etc. Thoughts?