Wickham or borini?

[ChrisAshley]

Borini.

 

[Kid Galahad]

Borini, by a distance as well.

Wickham is getting better though.

This for me too, think back to Borini's finishing, any angle and he was rarely off target, Wickham tends to leather everything, but like you say there's definitely improvement in him.

 

[SproutMackem]

Borini's finishing, any angle and he was rarely off target,.

Sorry, but that's completely wrong. He blasted high, wide and mighty. The odd one rocketed in.

 

[Kid Galahad]

Sorry, but that's completely wrong. He blasted high, wide and mighty. The odd one rocketed in.

I'd like to see a % of shots/shots on target, I reckon it will be way higher than Connor's?

 

[hardlife]

Borini by a mile imo. he'd have nicked a goal or two in our 10 draws giving us a few extra points

This lady knows her onions!

 

[SAFC 2012]

I'd prefer Wickham. The obsession with Borini needs to stop.

Hes much better than wickham

 

[Fabulous Falcao]

Wickham easily

 

[East Riding Mackem]

Wickham, though Borini is a better penna taker.

 

[Ilios]

Hes much better than wickham

He really isn't. He just takes a good penalty.

 

[SAFC 2012]

He really isn't. He just takes a good penalty.

he is though

wickham is poor

 

[cluffy]

both

 

[look out piano]

Considering the only player on our books is Connor, its a bit of a daft question.

 

[Ilios]

he is though

wickham is poor

Wickham's goalscoring record in PL games since the start of last season is better than Borini's, even including his boatload of penalties.
Wickham is bigger, stronger, faster, a better ball-carrier, 2 years younger, and is already ours. Plus, he actually wants to be here.
He had a frustrating game against Newcastle (he has a few to be fair), but he is growing into the position (although it's certainly not his best position) and will get better with age. There is no point in spending however many millions on somebody who doesn't want to be here, is no better than what we have, and who's overwhelming main threat has been replaced Jordi Gomez from the penalty spot.

 

[PTR]

Totally different types of player, so no real point comparing them

 

[SAFC 2012]

Wickham's goalscoring record in PL games since the start of last season is better than Borini's, even including his boatload of penalties.
Wickham is bigger, stronger, faster, a better ball-carrier, 2 years younger, and is already ours. Plus, he actually wants to be here.
He had a frustrating game against Newcastle (he has a few to be fair), but he is growing into the position (although it's certainly not his best position) and will get better with age. There is no point in spending however many millions on somebody who doesn't want to be here, is no better than what we have, and who's overwhelming main threat has been replaced Jordi Gomez from the penalty spot.

A lot of that is wrong

 

[HoffTTM]

Borini, comfortably

Wickham needs games in the middle

 

[marko7969]

We've got Whickham, so, Fabio.... BOTH!

Borini on the left, 2 up top

 

[Parkmaverick]

we can't pick Borini he's not our player.;

 

[Topcat1]

Borini by a mile

 

[Burnopfield Mackem]

Borini is the better option on the left than CW in the system we play. If we could sign Borini in Jan, CW would be good cover for Fletcher through the middle.