Discussion in 'Pure Football' started by festa, Aug 12, 2012.
Depending on which paper you read.
Puts the Fletcher price into the Narnia category.
RvP is 29, and has a year left before he's a free agent, the comparison is flawed
Not to mention the massive wages he'll be demanding.
Add the approx £200k a week salary as well..
dont get it mat e?
and 100K+ wages.
united will sell a million RVP shirts when he sign,
money back in no time.
what a total fuckwit
the op is an idiot.
If they want to throw price comparisons about.
A top, top player going for the same price as what Wolves are asking for Fletcher? Forget the contractual/wages differences, I see where the OP is coming from.
why would you forget about the contractual/wage differences etc?
Cheers could you please explain to that fuckwit Superkev.
Why dont you throw in shirt sales, sponsorships, income you clown.
I've already asked him you complete fuckwit - tell you what why don't you explain it.
alright then throw it in - it still makes absolute nonsense of your opening post - mind you could say that about every post you make - fucking oxygen thief.
Too much for your half a cell to comprehend.
Here he is Johnny No Stars.
Ok, let me put it another way. Assuming both players would come, who would you buy if they both cost the same?
Of course RVP's contract situation means the buying club is in a stronger bargaining position compared to the reverse being the case with Fletcher but you've got to admit that on the face of it it looks crazy that the 2 should be valued the same and this is coming from someone who would love to see us get Fletcher.
Disregarding RVP's quoted price, Fletcher's price is bollocks.
Darren Bent went for less than what Wolves are asking and he is twice the goalscorer Fletcher could ever hope to be.
I think Superkev could be in bother his half cell has exploded.
Separate names with a comma.