he's rubbish mate. Absolute tosh.
He out scored everyone in our team last season.
Has obvious flaws, but any midfielder scoring 31 league goals in 5 seasons is neither "rubbish" nor "tosh".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he's rubbish mate. Absolute tosh.
He out scored everyone in our team last season.
Has obvious flaws, but any midfielder scoring 31 league goals in 5 seasons is neither "rubbish" nor "tosh".
The talk about Charlie Austin has reminded me about this lad. Cracking goalscoring record and has outscored Charlie Austin in every season. They've always been in the same league except for last season.
Rhodes - Austin last six seasons
23 - 20
22 - 17
40 - 17
30 - 28
25 - 20
21 - 18 (Austin in the Premier League this season)
That's a cracking goalscoring record. Is there any reason to believe Rhodes couldn't make the step up and replicate/excel what Austin achieved last season?
50 or so of his 400 appearances in the prem. Vast majority in the Championship.
At least you have your little yellow friends to keep you company. Here, have another
Cliched nonsense. And if he did try a number of expansive passes/through balls and only a small percentage came off, they'd create a lot of chances.
using that logic, you're suggesting Charlie Adam is a better goalscorer than Jermain Defoe which just isn't true.
I've got no time for Charlie Adam - none, zero, zilch.
f***ing hell whats pissed on your chips like? Only passing on my opinion and actually giving a reason why I think it, rather than just "he's shite" comments
Cattermole's range of passing is lightyears ahead of that punter.
I really don't like Charlie Adam as you can tell.
He's slower and weaker than Austin.
You're definitely using nobody's "logic" but your own when you reach this idiot conclusion.
You're the one with the pissy attitude mate, not sure why you're trying to turn it around.
Oh boy.
Not liking him is fine.
That would seem to be the obvious argument, yet he's outscored him every single season, and quite comfortably a few times.
That would seem to be the obvious argument, yet he's outscored him every single season, and quite comfortably a few times.
it is mate. If i could be arsed, I'd dig out the GIF of Cattermole's range of passing from last season that @andy78 posted on Twitter but I can't be arsed.
you can't use Charlie Adam outscoring our entire team (individually) as a positive then claim he isn't better at scoring goals than one of our players. That doesn't make any sense.
.
f***ing hell whats pissed on your chips like? Only passing on my opinion and actually giving a reason why I think it, rather than just "he's shite" comments
Fletcher is first choice for Scotland, every time he is fit. Fletcher is better than Rhodes and gets dogs abuse on here and is apparently shite. Vardy was picked, as the Leicester wankathon was in full throttle and that makes a difference in international selection, wrongly. He should be know where near the England squad. Fletcher is the main man for Scotland up front every time.
No pissy attitude at all mate. You're the one thathad a pop at me. Anyway, he's not the answer for me at all and no better than what we have imo.You're the one with the pissy attitude mate, not sure why you're trying to turn it around.
Oh boy.
Not liking him is fine.
That would seem to be the obvious argument, yet he's outscored him every single season, and quite comfortably a few times.
Far from convinced Rhodes would do anything in the premiership than what we have already.All it means is that Fletcher is preferred in the current Scotland system, whatever that is. I'd imagine his Premier League pedigree would play a reasonable part.
Ta-da!you can't use Charlie Adam outscoring our entire team (individually) as a positive then claim he isn't better at scoring goals than one of our players. That doesn't make any sense.
Charlie Adam is a wasteful punter and Gordon Strachan knows it.
it is mate. If i could be arsed, I'd dig out the GIF of Cattermole's range of passing from last season that @andy78 posted on Twitter but I can't be arsed.
Rhodes can't get a sniff for Scotland, the same side where Fletcher is 1st choice (and he isn't even 1st choice here!).
He could make it, but as has been said, Blackburn paid a ridiculous fee and will want at least a slight profit on it. Which means somebody will have to cough up upwards of £10m for a 25 year old who has never played in the PL, and can't get in the Scotland squad. It would be a massive risk.
I am no fan of Adam either but think any neutral would have Adam's range of passing ahead of Cattermole.
That's not to say he is a better player mind
Good players always find spaceIf he's flanked by 2 others, Rhodes or Austin would be excellent for us. Their movement and instinct is excellent, pace becomes less of an issues if it's around you as it makes you space.