podolski/fletcher

[stoja]

espn now scored twice.didnt arsenal pay £10/11 million for him.wolves want £20 million with add ons.unreal

[hank williams]

Originally Posted by stoja

espn now scored twice.didnt arsenal pay £10/11 million for him.wolves want £20 million with add ons.unreal

Ones British other foreigner
Clubs always pay more for British players

[SuperSunderland]

Originally Posted by stoja

espn now scored twice.didnt arsenal pay £10/11 million for him.wolves want £20 million with add ons.unreal

Podolski's price is irrelevant, Even if he cost 10p he wouldn't come here in a million years.

Coupled with the fact his wages are probably double what Fletchers are going to be.

[Hatful Of Hollow]

So what are you suggesting, that we should have bid for Podolski as he was 'cheaper'?

[naughtynose]

Never understood the point in these threads

[hank williams]

Originally Posted by naughtynose

Never understood the point in these threads

Can't wait for school holidays to end & this board goes back to normal

[Hulkster]

Originally Posted by hank williams

Ones British other foreigner
Clubs always pay more for British players

Stupid ones do.

British players are crap, no reason to pay more for them.

Mind we had no chance of Podolski, a better comparison would be Cisse.

[My Ambiguous Seagull]

Originally Posted by naughtynose

Never understood the point in these threads

That a very good striker is worth £10 million and a bald, shit footballer is worth £15 million plus, according to pussy face Moxey.

MON and short should be popping down to Ann Summers and stocking up on strap ons and going and giving Moxey a good old fashioned Sunday night treat.

[jsdftm04]

Plus podolski only had a year left iirc

[CalAl]

Originally Posted by hank williams

Can't wait for school holidays to end & this board goes back to normal

Careful what you wish for. The percentage of WUMs could well stay the same.