Andy Carroll on loan?

[Euro Plums]

Originally Posted by rocky

Carroll is exactly what we need, he'd be a great, if unrealistic, signing.

How is he?

We'd just end up lumping it upfield.

[rocky]

Originally Posted by Euro Plums

How is he?

We'd just end up lumping it upfield.

We don;t have to, I don't think MON would allow it to be honest

He'd bring players into the game, would be a threat from set pieces and general crosses. IMO he's exactly what we need.

[godsgifttoearth]

i'd have him in the team. think he gets far too much stick and he could be a quality target man.

he's not stupid enough to ever make the move like.

[Barry Siddall]

Originally Posted by john1984

I know I'll be shot down. He's a mag, he's a horrible dirty kernt etc. But, he is the target man we need. And Rodgers has said he will consider a loan deal. Views?

Whats yours first ?

[ray drummond]

well he's hated by the mags, maybe he feels let down by them & is secretly thinking how to rile them even more,remember he asked for a pay rise but obviously they couldn't match liverpools.isn't his mam an safc fan? if so mon should be on the phone telling her the s/stands selling well & that she should get the party started.

[naughtynose]

Is Carroll deffo a mag anyway? Is he actually on record as saying he is? Because ive never heard it. his family are mackems

Regardless, lets have him. Would be great for us imo and has point to prove

Plus it would annoy them something rotten too

[john1984]

Originally Posted by Barry Siddall

Whats yours first ?

He'd be ideal for us. Larsson and McClean would actually have someone to aim at.

[Andy_Roker1983]

I'd have him in an instant.

[DEfromBC]

Originally Posted by Euro Plums

He'd miss anyway, the fucking donkey.

We don't want him, we'd just go route one and it'd be awful to watch.

Better then route none. The displays were a bit negative over the last 10 games of the season. How many goals were scored?

[Gaz]

Can't see it happening, but yes i'd have him here