As far as underserved victories goes

[20 B&H]

Originally Posted by Hetzkes Ballet Teacher

I don't think MON's tactical masterplan involved our midfield being shite for most of the game, nor our defence to keep launching airballs upfield that we lost 100% of, nor avoiding putting 3 fluid passes together for over half the game.

Read the match reports in tomorrows papers. It'll be interesting to see how many say the best team won.

I have to agree to be honest.

I'm chuffed with the win but people who say we invited them onto us makes it sound like we had a choice

We defended brilliantly and scored two superb goals and yes scoring more goals than your opponent is the name of the game but they gave us the run around in midfield to the point that we surrendered that territory to them and were content to launch aimless balls forward.

great win against a good side but we must be better at home.

[Clink2]

Originally Posted by gards2

That's right up there

We were outclassed and outplayed all over the pitch apart from our proverbial counter attacks we offered very little again in the final third.

Tactics mate!
You cant see the big picture.

[Hetzkes Ballet Teacher]

Originally Posted by Floyd

"put a quality striker up front for them and we'd have lost"?

Aye, and if me aunty had bollocks she'd be me uncle... And he"s mad is he?

Her bollocks would only make her your uncle if everything else about her was already manly.

[sonson]

Originally Posted by Hetzkes Ballet Teacher

That's because McClean has 2 touches then whips a cross in. Dyer does more passing, probing and running through for the return ball. He looks a very good player, easily better than that numpty SWP who used to play for England.

And how many chances did he create? How many goals did he score? How many times was he involved in a lead up to a goal and a move that didn't break down and just end up in passing sideways forever until someone took a shot 25 yards out in frustration? How many times did he get behind his marker?

[Pacific]

what a bizarre post

fair play to Swansea they pass the ball around brilliantly from the back but when they got to the final third they offered nothing

we created the best chances of the game, Sess and Wickham both missed sitters. it wasnt comfortable but we deserved to win

[Marlon Brendo]

Originally Posted by Hetzkes Ballet Teacher

Imagine that game without the two moments of Sess/Gardner genius, and with the pie eater on the sidelines instead of MON.

It would have been more "shite that Bruce served up". FACT.

That's the most ridiculous thing you've ever posted on here.

Imagine the game but take out all the good bits.

It's like asking me to remember the day we buried my grandad. Take away the fact he was dead Nd everyone was sad and you're left with an amazing day.

[Irriducibili]

Originally Posted by sonson

And how many chances did he create? How many goals did he score? How many times was he involved in a lead up to a goal and a move that didn't break down and just end up in passing sideways forever until someone took a shot 25 yards out in frustration? How many times did he get behind his marker?

You know the answer mate. He's a championship player playing to his max potential. He's playing with confidence but ultimately he wouldn't have a hope in hell of getting into our side.

[sonson]

Originally Posted by 20 B&H

I have to agree to be honest.

I'm chuffed with the win but people who say we invited them onto us makes it sound like we had a choice

We defended brilliantly and scored two superb goals and yes scoring more goals than your opponent is the name of the game but they gave us the run around in midfield to the point that we surrendered that territory to them and were content to launch aimless balls forward.

great win against a good side but we must be better at home.

The bit were as soon as Swansea got the ball, and *all* of our players ran into their position rather than chase the ball? Not all teams do that. when a team does that, surrending ground for defensive positioning, it *is* inviting them on.

[jsdftm04]

We never looked like conceding, hardly a smash and grab. Whenever they had the ball you never felt like we were going to concede.

[---Nemo---]

Originally Posted by Hetzkes Ballet Teacher

That's because McClean has 2 touches then whips a cross in. Dyer does more passing, probing and running through for the return ball. He looks a very good player, easily better than that numpty SWP who used to play for England.

He looked canny but today he wasn't particularly effective. A fault that ran throughout their entire side today. You could see why they haven't scored many goals away from home.