Register and logon to remove this advert
21st January 2012, 05:39 PM
|
#111
|
|
Midfield
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hetzkes Ballet Teacher
You, sir, are mad. Put a quality striker up front for them and we'd have lost today. They had our measure, and then some, everywhere else on the field baring the 20 seconds in which we scored 2 wonder strikes. Dyer in particular was frightening.
|
"put a quality striker up front for them and we'd have lost"?
Aye, and if me aunty had bollocks she'd be me uncle... And he"s mad is he?
__________________
The Hunter - Legend... crap taste in music like...
|
|
|
21st January 2012, 05:39 PM
|
#112
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Here, temporarily
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hetzkes Ballet Teacher
I don't think MON's tactical masterplan involved our midfield being shite for most of the game, nor our defence to keep launching airballs upfield that we lost 100% of, nor avoiding putting 3 fluid passes together for over half the game.
Read the match reports in tomorrows papers. It'll be interesting to see how many say the best team won.
|
I'm a bit surprised about some of the personal abuse to be honest, probably shouldn't be though
I'm as happy as anyone else we won ffs 
__________________
Mignolet!Mignolet!Biggest hands in the world they say
He plays for Belgium he plays for us,He's bigger than Elvis as big as a Bus
|
|
|
21st January 2012, 05:41 PM
|
#113
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frimley
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by gards2
I'm a bit surprised about some of the personal abuse to be honest, probably shouldn't be though
I'm as happy as anyone else we won ffs 
|
Totally deserved 
__________________
It's all about opinions
|
|
|
21st January 2012, 05:41 PM
|
#114
|
|
Striker
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by ---Nemo---
Put fewer crosses in than McClean.
|
That's because McClean has 2 touches then whips a cross in. Dyer does more passing, probing and running through for the return ball. He looks a very good player, easily better than that numpty SWP who used to play for England.
|
|
|
21st January 2012, 05:41 PM
|
#115
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Antibes via Allendale Cottages
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by gards2
I'm a bit surprised about some of the personal abuse to be honest, probably shouldn't be though
I'm as happy as anyone else we won ffs 
|
Fuck off 
__________________
When we were cheated I put aside 3 beers, drank one each when Coventry & Bristol went down and I'm saving the last for when Jimmy Hill dies. Bitter? No, lager actually.
|
|
|
21st January 2012, 05:42 PM
|
#116
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Doncaster
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by SurreyMackem
Fully desrerved win.
In the Prem, as we have learned, no matter what your tactics or how hard you work all it takes is a bit of quality to win games and we had the quality players and they didn't.
|
This this this. We knew how they'd play, we set up to counter that as we've been doing so well lately. Yes they passed around us a lot, but we denied them that bit of space in the final third and we got our just deserts.
|
|
|
21st January 2012, 05:43 PM
|
#117
|
|
Winger
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sunderland
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by gards2
That's right up there
We were outclassed and outplayed all over the pitch apart from our proverbial counter attacks we offered very little again in the final third.
|
Mon said last week after the Chelsea game he would be happy for Swansea to play us off the park and nick a win..
End of thread... 
|
|
|
21st January 2012, 05:43 PM
|
#118
|
|
Midfield
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by gards2
I'm a bit surprised about some of the personal abuse to be honest, probably shouldn't be though
I'm as happy as anyone else we won ffs 
|
This place is as edgy as owt these days like, but if u start a thread as daft as this the ur gonna get slaughtered and 'twas always thus
__________________
The Hunter - Legend... crap taste in music like...
|
|
|
21st January 2012, 05:43 PM
|
#119
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: A Sandwich
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hetzkes Ballet Teacher
I don't think MON's tactical masterplan involved our midfield being shite for most of the game, nor our defence to keep launching airballs upfield that we lost 100% of, nor avoiding putting 3 fluid passes together for over half the game.
Read the match reports in tomorrows papers. It'll be interesting to see how many say the best team won.
|
I don't think I've ever read that when we've played against a team more popular than us. Swansea will be that at the moment. And the media have massive hard-ons for posesison football just now so of course it won't be favourable.
Our midfiled got in front of Swansea will and were instrumental in both goals. If by being shite you mean not having a really higher pass completed record or 90 passes made each then yes. But again I'd point you to the fact that their midfield passing all the time led to very few chances. 67% posession and 4 shots on target is piss weak.
__________________
It is too east to type the dismissal of contempt.
|
|
|
21st January 2012, 05:43 PM
|
#120
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sunderland
|
Re: As far as underserved victories goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hetzkes Ballet Teacher
You, sir, are mad. Put a quality striker up front for them and we'd have lost today. They had our measure, and then some, everywhere else on the field baring the 20 seconds in which we scored 2 wonder strikes. Dyer in particular was frightening.
|
Dyer was frightening?  Embarrassing!
Yeah you could put a capable striker up front but the same could be said for us. We still beat them 2-0 and it should have been more.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:42 AM.
|