18m

rjtm3 · 31st January 2011, 06:41 PM

Why are sky et al continually quoting this figure when the chairman of Safc is on tape as saying its a bit more than 24m?

Do facts not matter?

31st January 2011, 06:41 PM

Not to Sky they don't

Teed · 31st January 2011, 06:41 PM

Who cares?

TartanMackem · 31st January 2011, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teed

Who cares?

This. I'd rather clubs think we got less than we did.

Krasnoyarsk kid · 31st January 2011, 06:43 PM

Sky are useless.

SurreyMackem · 31st January 2011, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjtm3

Why are sky et al continually quoting this figure when the chairman of Safc is on tape as saying its a bit more than 24m?

Do facts not matter?

He said we paid a bit more than £10M for Bent.

Joe-B · 31st January 2011, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TartanMackem

This. I'd rather clubs think we got less than we did.

Spot on.

Super Chimp · 31st January 2011, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TartanMackem

This. I'd rather clubs think we got less than we did.

Agreed

rjtm3 · 31st January 2011, 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TartanMackem

This. I'd rather clubs think we got less than we did.

Explain?

Edit. Just before you say something ridiculous like, so they don't know how much we've got to spend. The clubs will know the facts, IM talking about the media.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SurreyMackem

He said we paid a bit more than £10M for Bent.

I mean the Irish interview.

Abu Dhabi Red and White · 31st January 2011, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjtm3

Why are sky et al continually quoting this figure when the chairman of Safc is on tape as saying its a bit more than 24m?

Do facts not matter?

Quinn could have been talking about the purchase price from Spurs when he said a little higher............