Register and logon to remove this advert
22nd October 2010, 07:55 AM
|
#1
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sconny Botland
|
4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
if we'd played one or the other all season, which would have yielded more points?
4-5-1 for me, we might have scored more goals 4-4-2 but we'd have conceded a lot more imho.
__________________
What I did, I did without choice, in the name of peace and sanity.
|
|
|
22nd October 2010, 07:57 AM
|
#2
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Stand
|
Re: 4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
442 at home 451 away IMO
|
|
|
22nd October 2010, 07:58 AM
|
#3
|
|
Central Defender
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Fulwell
|
Re: 4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
winnable games, especially at home- 442
tougher looking games, maybe most away from home- 451
__________________
God took Messi and Pele, mixed the two to make one, and he came up with Stephane Sessegnon!!
|
|
|
22nd October 2010, 08:27 AM
|
#4
|
|
Reserve Squad
|
Re: 4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jord18
winnable games, especially at home- 442
tougher looking games, maybe most away from home- 451
|
agreed, at home we need to start collecting wins not draws, the Cattemole 4 points would have made such a difference !
|
|
|
22nd October 2010, 08:31 AM
|
#5
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Antibes via Allendale Cottages
|
Re: 4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trotski
agreed, at home we need to start collecting wins not draws, the Cattemole 4 points would have made such a difference !
|
I think Bruce has had his hand forced by circumstances such as Campbell's injury, the sendings off and the quality of the opposition ............ with Gyan fit, and Welbeck settling in, I think he'll know that we need to be winning games.
__________________
When we were cheated I put aside 3 beers, drank one each when Coventry & Bristol went down and I'm saving the last for when Jimmy Hill dies. Bitter? No, lager actually.
|
|
|
22nd October 2010, 08:34 AM
|
#6
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Doncaster
|
Re: 4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
So far I think it's been correct to have mainly played 451 and I'm not sure against those sides and in those circumstances that had we played 442 we'd have scored more goals. You never know I suppose - at the moment draws against Liverpool and Man Utd (IMO) dont look as good as they first did given how recent sides have done against them.
Now however we have we have to start to utilise some of that £13m we spent on Gyan and not totally rely on Bent, because if we stick to 451 we'd maybe have been better off spending £9m or so of the money on someone like N'Zogbia, though again it wasn't really possible as we'd have had no cover whatsoever up front.
|
|
|
22nd October 2010, 08:58 AM
|
#7
|
|
Central Defender
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The South
|
Re: 4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
4-5-1 against the 1 point'ers, changing to more of a 4-3-3 against the 3 pointer'ers
|
|
|
22nd October 2010, 09:04 AM
|
#8
|
|
Winger
|
Re: 4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
If its not broke dont fix it! 4-5-1
|
|
|
22nd October 2010, 10:04 AM
|
#9
|
|
Winger
|
Re: 4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
much as it pains me to say it but its 4-5-1.think it depends on who we play also,against lesser teams at home we should play 4-4-2 though.
|
|
|
22nd October 2010, 10:12 AM
|
#10
|
|
Central Defender
|
Re: 4-4-2 or 4-5-1......
To me i dont think we would concede any more than we have. The difference this year is our back 4 especially bramble, have been fantastic. Half the time in 451 we play welbeck on the wing who isnt a midfielder and doest work like one so often stays forward so were pretty much playing 442. The difference this season is were playing proper football, entertaining to watch and playing very well against teams, playing 442 would just increase our chances of scoring more. otherwise it was pointless signing gyan as well
__________________
‘This Sunderland is one crazy, son-of-a-bitch club’.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 PM.
|