Bruce & N'Zogbia....

[StonesFTM]

Originally Posted by George Kaplan

The lass who cheats with you, will cheat on you.

You still shag her though-but

Hope this helps

So despite your original post, your up for signing him then?

[Macho]

Originally Posted by Deggsy

Being the critical word here

Indeed, but it doesnt stop me commenting on other peoples reactions on here.

[stubber]

Originally Posted by maradona kebab

Fine by me.
It's a dirty nasty game especially as epitomised by the premier league.
Bottom line is that board probably has similar posters to what this board does.
People with no clue whatsoever

Spot on, Des. Those are the rules of engagement so that's how it's done. Fair play to Brucie.

[Wearsider]

Originally Posted by Macho

Exactly, hypocritical.

I want whatever is best for SAFC, pretty much regardless of what we do to achieve it, but not for anyone else, if thats being hypocritical then I'm a hypocrit and proud.

[ayesane]

Originally Posted by Macho

Exactly, hypocritical.

Harry took Kaboul to a casino on the drink; used all the tools availible to gain his signature, thats fair play. We didn't and lost out; thus feeling abit pissed off.

It's dog eat dog; we need to use all of the tools availible and quickly - waste of time pissing about when most other clubs are using all possible means to gain an advantage.

Thats like saying it's hypocrital to cheer a goal scored for and boo a goal against...

[Northern Munkey]

Well its not as if old saggy face hasnt pulled off about 50 of his signings by doing exactly the same thing

[Macho]

Originally Posted by Wearsider

I want whatever is best for SAFC, pretty much regardless of what we do to achieve it, but not for anyone else, if thats being hypocritical then I'm a hypocrit and proud.

Fair enough. Im not saying you in particular but dont go screaming and stamping feet when Redknapp does a dirty deal.

Originally Posted by ayesane

Thats like saying it's hypocritical to cheer a goal scored for and boo a goal against...

No its not..... Its being Hypocritical by saying its ok for one but not for the other.

[ayesane]

Originally Posted by Macho

Fair enough. Im not saying you in particular but dont go screaming and stamping feet when Redknapp does a dirty deal.



No its not..... Its being Hypocritical by saying its ok for one but not for the other.

It's ok for sunderland to score against Brum, but it's not ok for brum to score against Sunderland. There; i've done it - i'm a hypocrit

[king of the road]

Originally Posted by George Kaplan

The lass who cheats with you, will cheat on you.

You still shag her though-but

Hope this helps

I agree with George here. He's just another Chimbonda - has advisors around him always looking to make another £1m for themselves on the next dodgy move.

His attitude was stinking at Newcastle, he's now gone 'on strike' at Wigan. He even left his French club under a cloud and the contractual dispute went on for months.

Plus he has the heart of a pea

[Midday Sun Englishman]

Originally Posted by JohnnyWheeltrim

Imagine if Spurs or West Ham had done this, they'd be getting called all sorts.

They have, they do ...... and they get away with it (as do Man Uts and Liverpool).