Register and logon to remove this advert
2nd March 2010, 02:57 PM
|
#11
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Co Durham
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Canon EOS20D, with IR-filter modification
Sigma 18-200
Zenitar 16mm fisheye
Leitz Telyt 180mm/f3.4 Apo
Pentax 6x7 200mm/f4 and 300mm/f4 - currently on their way, no adaptor to use them yet!
Purely used for astronomical stuff.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0irL1M15DH8
|
|
|
2nd March 2010, 06:25 PM
|
#12
|
|
Striker
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pre revolutionary Mexico, TX
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoker
Canon EOS20D, with IR-filter modification
Sigma 18-200
Zenitar 16mm fisheye
Leitz Telyt 180mm/f3.4 Apo
Pentax 6x7 200mm/f4 and 300mm/f4 - currently on their way, no adaptor to use them yet!
Purely used for astronomical stuff.
|
What's involved in the IR Filter Mod Smoker?
__________________
Bognor Regis is a tartan that covers all of Yorkshire
|
|
|
2nd March 2010, 06:30 PM
|
#13
|
|
Midfield
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Sony a200 with the kit lens
Can't wait until I finish this Masters and start working properly again..I'm going to go turn in to a proper gear nerd!
|
|
|
2nd March 2010, 07:02 PM
|
#14
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Co Durham
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AB22 Easy Tiger
What's involved in the IR Filter Mod Smoker?
|
It's the replacement of the in-built UV/IR filter with a model with much better far-red transmission. The universe is teaming with Hydrogen alpha at 656nm, but the stock Canon filter reduces this to about 5-20% depending on model. A replacement filter gives you 95%+.
The drawback of the mod is your ordinary/daytime pictures have a pink cast. You can get a filter to undo this, but you end up with a multiplicity of step rings unless all your lenses are on the same filter size! As I rarely use the camera on auto I just use Custom White Balance calibrated on a shot of white printer paper and this does a good job.
Some people have the filter removed altogether, which gives you 100% H-alpha transmission but it also passes shit loads of IR which registers as white, and therefore needs to be filtered out by a separate filter in the image path. It also stops the chip and viewfinder being parfocal!
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0irL1M15DH8
|
|
|
2nd March 2010, 08:25 PM
|
#15
|
|
Midfield
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Abu Dhabi and Durham at xmas
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoker
It's the replacement of the in-built UV/IR filter with a model with much better far-red transmission. The universe is teaming with Hydrogen alpha at 656nm, but the stock Canon filter reduces this to about 5-20% depending on model. A replacement filter gives you 95%+.
The drawback of the mod is your ordinary/daytime pictures have a pink cast. You can get a filter to undo this, but you end up with a multiplicity of step rings unless all your lenses are on the same filter size! As I rarely use the camera on auto I just use Custom White Balance calibrated on a shot of white printer paper and this does a good job.
Some people have the filter removed altogether, which gives you 100% H-alpha transmission but it also passes shit loads of IR which registers as white, and therefore needs to be filtered out by a separate filter in the image path. It also stops the chip and viewfinder being parfocal!
|
What he said 
__________________
its alreet mate i got a lift.........
|
|
|
2nd March 2010, 08:28 PM
|
#16
|
|
Striker
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoker
It's the replacement of the in-built UV/IR filter with a model with much better far-red transmission. The universe is teaming with Hydrogen alpha at 656nm, but the stock Canon filter reduces this to about 5-20% depending on model. A replacement filter gives you 95%+.
The drawback of the mod is your ordinary/daytime pictures have a pink cast. You can get a filter to undo this, but you end up with a multiplicity of step rings unless all your lenses are on the same filter size! As I rarely use the camera on auto I just use Custom White Balance calibrated on a shot of white printer paper and this does a good job.
Some people have the filter removed altogether, which gives you 100% H-alpha transmission but it also passes shit loads of IR which registers as white, and therefore needs to be filtered out by a separate filter in the image path. It also stops the chip and viewfinder being parfocal!
|
Odds on for photo board post of year even with 10 months remaining 
|
|
|
2nd March 2010, 08:36 PM
|
#17
|
|
Midfield
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Abu Dhabi and Durham at xmas
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by youmademerealise
Odds on for photo board post of year even with 10 months remaining 
|
Can you translate it for me please? 
__________________
its alreet mate i got a lift.........
|
|
|
2nd March 2010, 10:04 PM
|
#18
|
|
Striker
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by APB
Can you translate it for me please? 
|
No.
|
|
|
2nd March 2010, 10:10 PM
|
#19
|
|
Striker
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pre revolutionary Mexico, TX
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoker
It's the replacement of the in-built UV/IR filter with a model with much better far-red transmission. The universe is teaming with Hydrogen alpha at 656nm, but the stock Canon filter reduces this to about 5-20% depending on model. A replacement filter gives you 95%+.
The drawback of the mod is your ordinary/daytime pictures have a pink cast. You can get a filter to undo this, but you end up with a multiplicity of step rings unless all your lenses are on the same filter size! As I rarely use the camera on auto I just use Custom White Balance calibrated on a shot of white printer paper and this does a good job.
Some people have the filter removed altogether, which gives you 100% H-alpha transmission but it also passes shit loads of IR which registers as white, and therefore needs to be filtered out by a separate filter in the image path. It also stops the chip and viewfinder being parfocal!
|
Thanks for that, I take it 656nm is the wavelength? I hadn't thought about the camera having a stock filter like that.
Edit: stupid question, of course it's the wavelength. Doh!
__________________
Bognor Regis is a tartan that covers all of Yorkshire
10:12 PM..
|
|
|
2nd March 2010, 10:53 PM
|
#20
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Co Durham
|
Re: So what equipment are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AB22 Easy Tiger
Thanks for that, I take it 656nm is the wavelength? I hadn't thought about the camera having a stock filter like that.
Edit: stupid question, of course it's the wavelength. Doh!
|
Yes. nm = nanometres.
Sorry if that was completely impenetrable, I'm used to typing this stuff for a more specialised audience.
The CMOS sensors used by DSLRs are not only sensitive to light, they are also sensitive to parts of the "invisible" spectrum like Ultra Violet and Infra Red. We don't want these in our photos so the manufacturers place a filter in front of the sensor to block this unwanted "light". Unfortunately, a lot of the stuff we want in astro shots is in the red section of the spectrum, quite close to infra-red we don't want, so unless the blocking filter has a nice sharp cut-off between the two, we lose loads of far-red light.
Hope that makes more sense.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0irL1M15DH8
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM.
|