Voting - Obsolete

[AB22 Easy Tiger]

Voting is NOT anonymous and you can vote for as many as you wish.

Please feel free to give feedback on this thread as to the reasons for your votes.

Voting closes in 7 days.

Good luck everyone.

[Ghost of EH7]

I'm being particularly harsh this month I think, and this is only MY OPINION, I've no doubt others will disagree, as they should.

Mercia said something in the discussion thread about being obsolete and not merely redundant, I thought that was a very pragmatic way of looking at this, so anything redundant, and not necessarily obsolete was marked down a bit.

Mercia: Clearly follows the theme but didn't benefit from looking so small. The sky was blown out a bit too.


grrwoofwookgrowl: More redundant than obsolete I think. I also have an issue with the composition, could have been closer to the ball.

WillD: I loved the idea but the river is blown out and I think the photo would have been much more effective had it been of just one pair of locks.

Hauser's Helmet - good idea, decent execution

Wayne the Punk - Not sure it quite met the theme but not a bad idea - slightly out of focus though, or is it just my eyes?

Peachbum - The Queen's head is a we bit blown out but that doesn't matter - the best picture in the competition by a country mile IMHO

Billy The Kid: Looks like HDR to me? Good idea but I wish the reflection of the tree hadn't been chopped off

not spavin: I liked the idea but the composition doesn't seem quite right - I'm not sure what the background was meant to represent and that's 2/3 of the picture.

bigmac: mare redundant than obsolete but I liked the idea

janiep: I really liked the idea of doing something different with the pier and thought the framing withthe Union Jack was good. I'd have liked to have seen the whole flag, and the pier to have been in focus too, maybe shot with a smaller aperture.

APB - Loved last month's shot but this just didn't work for me. Can't really put my finger on why.

Roger - Great idea and well executed. I just wish the arm on the record had been is focus

SuperKev - I liked the composition and the execution, but again, not sure it's obsolete, more redundant (have I got a bee in my bonnet here?)

robinp: not sure what to make of this, I guess that truck is obsolete though.

Cartman: I liked this one but it looked rather dark on my (calibrated) monitor

Ghost of EH7 - rubbish

taipeisafc: see my comments on grrwoofwoofgrowl above.

Crazylegs: Hmmm, there's a lot of obsolescence in there - but it's very busy

ThankHEavenForShed7: See taipeisafc above

keeps21: A nice shot, well lit and a good idea. Slight issue with the composition, would have liked to have seen just a part of the sewing machine shot closer up.

Overall, just one vote from me. Peachbum was so far ahead of the field I couldn't in all good conscience give an equal vote to the two others I was considering: Cartman and keeps21

[taipeisafc]

My vote goes to Roger this month, great idea and very well lit (I disagree with Ghost of EH7 about focus as in my opinion it is motion blur caused by arm movement on a long exposure). Peachbum's was close second. I do agree with Ghost of EH7 comments on obsolete - I don't think my photo really follows the theme (as I mentioned in the discussion thread) but I struggled to get something which I was happy with as obsolete and ran out of time (plus I am 1200 km from my camera at the moment)

[Cartman]

I agree with Ghost of EH7...his is rubbish just kidding mate, it got my one vote this month, really like the framing and lighting.

You are right about mine too, it is a bit dark. I was going for a creepy look but went a bit too far

It's all good though, I think the voting could be spread about a lot this month as there are a few contenders

[APB]

Originally Posted by Ghost of EH7

I'm being particularly harsh this month I think, and this is only MY OPINION, I've no doubt others will disagree, as they should.

Mercia said something in the discussion thread about being obsolete and not merely redundant, I thought that was a very pragmatic way of looking at this, so anything redundant, and not necessarily obsolete was marked down a bit.

Mercia: Clearly follows the theme but didn't benefit from looking so small. The sky was blown out a bit too.


grrwoofwookgrowl: More redundant than obsolete I think. I also have an issue with the composition, could have been closer to the ball.

WillD: I loved the idea but the river is blown out and I think the photo would have been much more effective had it been of just one pair of locks.

Hauser's Helmet - good idea, decent execution

Wayne the Punk - Not sure it quite met the theme but not a bad idea - slightly out of focus though, or is it just my eyes?

Peachbum - The Queen's head is a we bit blown out but that doesn't matter - the best picture in the competition by a country mile IMHO

Billy The Kid: Looks like HDR to me? Good idea but I wish the reflection of the tree hadn't been chopped off

not spavin: I liked the idea but the composition doesn't seem quite right - I'm not sure what the background was meant to represent and that's 2/3 of the picture.

bigmac: mare redundant than obsolete but I liked the idea

janiep: I really liked the idea of doing something different with the pier and thought the framing withthe Union Jack was good. I'd have liked to have seen the whole flag, and the pier to have been in focus too, maybe shot with a smaller aperture.

APB - Loved last month's shot but this just didn't work for me. Can't really put my finger on why.

Roger - Great idea and well executed. I just wish the arm on the record had been is focus

SuperKev - I liked the composition and the execution, but again, not sure it's obsolete, more redundant (have I got a bee in my bonnet here?)

robinp: not sure what to make of this, I guess that truck is obsolete though.

Cartman: I liked this one but it looked rather dark on my (calibrated) monitor

Ghost of EH7 - rubbish

taipeisafc: see my comments on grrwoofwoofgrowl above.

Crazylegs: Hmmm, there's a lot of obsolescence in there - but it's very busy

ThankHEavenForShed7: See taipeisafc above

keeps21: A nice shot, well lit and a good idea. Slight issue with the composition, would have liked to have seen just a part of the sewing machine shot closer up.

Overall, just one vote from me. Peachbum was so far ahead of the field I couldn't in all good conscience give an equal vote to the two others I was considering: Cartman and keeps21

Didn't work for me either mate, I made a decision to enter every month and with no opportunities or decent ideas I just fired that off on a road trip.... I can't even take credit for it as it was the wife who shouted 'obsolete' when she seen it.

Must try harder

[not spavin]

Anyone else have problems voting on multiple entries?

Originally Posted by Ghost of EH7

not spavin: I liked the idea but the composition doesn't seem quite right - I'm not sure what the background was meant to represent and that's 2/3 of the picture.

Totally agree with that fwiw. Fairly disappointed with how it turned out, picked the wrong lens, shot it at the wrong time of day and messed up the composition as the flames took quicker than I thought, and I panicked

Good learning experience tho but, and I suppose that's the whole point.

[janiep]

Originally Posted by Ghost of EH7

janiep: I really liked the idea of doing something different with the pier and thought the framing withthe Union Jack was good. I'd have liked to have seen the whole flag, and the pier to have been in focus too, maybe shot with a smaller aperture.

Very helpful feedback there, thank you. I took it on Easter Bank Holiday Monday, and I had to lay down flat on a very busy Brighton promenade to get the flag and the pier lined up, through the promenade railings. I was getting some very strange looks! I think I felt a bit self conscious and so didn't take the time to shoot it over and over again, experimenting with things like aperture, exact position of the flag etc. Lesson learnt - you sometimes have to look like an idiot for the sake of art .

For me, this was a different type of pic this month: with my last two, the subject has filled the whole of the frame and I wanted to do something different, e.g two objects quite far apart (pier and flag). Here's the Pseuds' Corner bit: when I look back at all my three entries, they have all depended for their effect on juxtapositions of incongruous things on each other. What I was pleased about with my entry this month is that, as I posted the day before we went to Brighton, I was going to try the West Pier, but I doubted I would be able to get a new take on it, and though I says it who perhaps shouldn't, I think I did, although I entirely take on board your comments about focus and the whole flag.

[Mercia Blackcat]

Mercia: Clearly follows the theme but didn't benefit from looking so small. The sky was blown out a bit too.

Yes, the picture I tried to upload to photobucket was larger. It was quite wide as I stiched together four shots that were hand held to make the final image.

Even when I added the border, the overall image was resized to the original upload so not sure what went on but I may have to use another webhost.

Agree about the comments, the light was poor and I took the opportunity early as I wouldn't be returning to the scene.

APB for me though.

[keeps21]

I was lying in bed last night at about 10 watching tele and thought, "shit I haven't entered a shot yet". So got up and took the shot of the sewing machine.

The definition of obsolete I followed was: 'no longer in general use; fallen into disuse'.

[SuperKev]

Originally Posted by Ghost of EH7

I'm being particularly harsh this month I think, and this is only MY OPINION, I've no doubt others will disagree, as they should.

Mercia said something in the discussion thread about being obsolete and not merely redundant, I thought that was a very pragmatic way of looking at this, so anything redundant, and not necessarily obsolete was marked down a bit.

Not going to get in to the voting just yet but IMHO you've got the wrong defintions for redundant and obsolete (or at least according to the oxford OnLine dictionary).

After Mercia's original post I thought I better make sure that what I was going to shoot (had about 4 or 5 ideas) were actually obsolete so had a quick look up and the definition I found [and used] was

obsolete

• adjective 1 no longer produced or used; out of date. 2 Biology rudimentary or vestigial.

— ORIGIN Latin obsoletus ‘grown old, worn out’, from obsolescere ‘fall into disuse’.

I think a few that you had marked down as redundant are actually obsolete - I know I've never seen a train going from Herrinton Pitt to Monkton Coke Works down that line since I've lived here

So give me a point yer git

P.S. Forgot to say I'm glad you posted your comments because some of things that you have pointed out on some of the pics I'd never have picked up in a month of sundays. But on looking at your comments and then back at the pics they jump straight out.