Register and logon to remove this advert
17th October 2011, 09:40 AM
|
#1
|
|
Reserve Squad
|
Bruce in, just.
Not been much of a Bruce outer, but I am certainly weighing it up this morning.
We maybe deserved a point and came away with none, but what did we have to lose yesterday?
Would our situation have worsened if we'd had more of a go (imo the two kids upfront and drop sess to the wing), and Arsenal had come good and put a few past us?
Yesterday was pretty local for me, but generally despite having a season ticket, i've struggled to get to most home games this last year, balancing family commitments and finances etc.
Obviousely not a true supporter etc. what ever you want to level at me but my point is its becoming really easy to avoid.
It can't be the results because as Bruce correctly states we finished 10th.
It can't be the players because I believe this is the best collective squad in my lifetime.
Bruce's tenure has just become boring and negative, we approach each game set up to be tight and difficult to break down (worked well yesterday.. for 29s), little to no attacking threat through this bad run (Jan '11 to present), even when he's playing Sessengon, Gyan or Bendtner who are all good attacking players.. neither really look comfortable in any of his systems.
Bruce has done a good job, and can maybe count himself unlucky regards last year, injuries, the bent saga, welbeck going off the boil, probably cost him a great season.
What he offers us now is stability, he's signed so many players he needs time to work out his best team and maybe as he's theatened to over the last couple of windows, add 1 or 2 quality players without a mass overhaul. Someone else coming in now would cost the club a fortune. Bruce's pay-off, significant transfer activity etc.
I think on the whole Bruce is still best for the club, but i'm not looking forward to watching the duration of this season. Apologies for the ramblings.
|
|
|
17th October 2011, 09:42 AM
|
#2
|
|
Winger
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: People's Republic of So' Shields
|
Re: Bruce in, just.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WelwynFTM
Not been much of a Bruce outer, but I am certainly weighing it up this morning.
We maybe deserved a point and came away with none, but what did we have to lose yesterday?
Would our situation have worsened if we'd had more of a go (imo the two kids upfront and drop sess to the wing), and Arsenal had come good and put a few past us?
Yesterday was pretty local for me, but generally despite having a season ticket, i've struggled to get to most home games this last year, balancing family commitments and finances etc.
Obviousely not a true supporter etc. what ever you want to level at me but my point is its becoming really easy to avoid.
It can't be the results because as Bruce correctly states we finished 10th.
It can't be the players because I believe this is the best collective squad in my lifetime.
Bruce's tenure has just become boring and negative, we approach each game set up to be tight and difficult to break down (worked well yesterday.. for 29s), little to no attacking threat through this bad run (Jan '11 to present), even when he's playing Sessengon, Gyan or Bendtner who are all good attacking players.. neither really look comfortable in any of his systems.
Bruce has done a good job, and can maybe count himself unlucky regards last year, injuries, the bent saga, welbeck going off the boil, probably cost him a great season.
What he offers us now is stability, he's signed so many players he needs time to work out his best team and maybe as he's theatened to over the last couple of windows, add 1 or 2 quality players without a mass overhaul. Someone else coming in now would cost the club a fortune. Bruce's pay-off, significant transfer activity etc.
I think on the whole Bruce is still best for the club, but i'm not looking forward to watching the duration of this season. Apologies for the ramblings.
|
damage is done, relegation looking more realistic by the game, and a manager slagging the fans.... no bent no gyan no hendo no zenden no steed, no chance
anybody still backing bruce after his recent conduct needs to evaluate who they really support, the club or steve bruce
__________________
FECK OFF!!!!
09:44 AM..
|
|
|
17th October 2011, 09:42 AM
|
#3
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Roker
|
Re: Bruce in, just.
It's not even the best squad in the last year, never mind 50 years. There is actually very little quality in the team and seeing as the manager has brought all of these players in the buck stops with him.
|
|
|
17th October 2011, 09:43 AM
|
#4
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In Sir Nialls Republic of Sunderland
|
Re: Bruce in, just.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WelwynFTM
Not been much of a Bruce outer, but I am certainly weighing it up this morning.
We maybe deserved a point and came away with none, but what did we have to lose yesterday?
Would our situation have worsened if we'd had more of a go (imo the two kids upfront and drop sess to the wing), and Arsenal had come good and put a few past us?
Yesterday was pretty local for me, but generally despite having a season ticket, i've struggled to get to most home games this last year, balancing family commitments and finances etc.
Obviousely not a true supporter etc. what ever you want to level at me but my point is its becoming really easy to avoid.
It can't be the results because as Bruce correctly states we finished 10th.
It can't be the players because I believe this is the best collective squad in my lifetime.
Bruce's tenure has just become boring and negative, we approach each game set up to be tight and difficult to break down (worked well yesterday.. for 29s), little to no attacking threat through this bad run (Jan '11 to present), even when he's playing Sessengon, Gyan or Bendtner who are all good attacking players.. neither really look comfortable in any of his systems.
Bruce has done a good job, and can maybe count himself unlucky regards last year, injuries, the bent saga, welbeck going off the boil, probably cost him a great season.
What he offers us now is stability, he's signed so many players he needs time to work out his best team and maybe as he's theatened to over the last couple of windows, add 1 or 2 quality players without a mass overhaul. Someone else coming in now would cost the club a fortune. Bruce's pay-off, significant transfer activity etc.
I think on the whole Bruce is still best for the club, but i'm not looking forward to watching the duration of this season. Apologies for the ramblings.
|
Don't be so fucking stupid.
__________________
Horse Punchers 0-3 Sunderland
|
|
|
17th October 2011, 09:47 AM
|
#5
|
|
Winger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Notts
|
Re: Bruce in, just.
He's had his chance mate and blew it.
In fact, he's only doing with us what he's always done.
He steadied the ship but has then turned round and blasted great big holes in it!
We should have got rid pre-summer.
|
|
|
17th October 2011, 09:47 AM
|
#6
|
|
Winger
|
Re: Bruce in, just.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WelwynFTM
We maybe deserved a point and came away with none, but what did we have to lose yesterday?
|
1) We did not deserve a point
2) Exactly, so why not go for it against one of the worst defences in the league.
You have just made me want him out more.
__________________
I'm now 41, thats a lot of shite to have been through with SAFC, if one day we achieve something and someone calls me a bandwagoner, I'll lamp them.
|
|
|
17th October 2011, 09:47 AM
|
#7
|
|
Striker
|
Re: Bruce in, just.
Take off the blinkers. Have a look around, Bruce has got rid of our best footballers and replaced with ageing Man Utd players, who look to be past it (Fergie is no fool), relegated players, very young, untried, untested players for key positions where again he has sold three of our best and most experienced players in Jones, Bent and Gyan. He has, in truth, made a complete hash of things and the niave, like yourself are hoping for some miracle to happen and that he will turn things around. Three home wins since 18th December 2010 tell me that he is incapable of doing that.
I haven't discussed tactics except to say, what tactics?
Bruce is the manager, football is a results driven business, wake up, we are fourth bottom and headed only in one direction. If he survives a defeat at Bolton, then Short wants his head testing.
__________________
He ain't heavy, he's my brother
09:49 AM..
|
|
|
17th October 2011, 09:48 AM
|
#8
|
|
Winger
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Hulme part of Cheadle
|
Re: Bruce in, just.
He has signed pedestrian plodders
Absolutely no pace and width in the team (so are no threat on the break) - oh, and no invention (so no threat when have a bit of possession)
Apart from that he is doing a good job
__________________
Blind panic is what you get when you cross Macar with McCartney.
|
|
|
17th October 2011, 09:49 AM
|
#9
|
|
Winger
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fulwell
|
Re: Bruce in, just.
Jesus wept. Get your heed out the sand.
|
|
|
17th October 2011, 09:53 AM
|
#10
|
|
Striker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hartlepool
|
Re: Bruce in, just.
On what planet did we deserve a bloody point? They had over 4 times as many corners, they had 2.5 times more shots than we did, they had in excess of 60% of the possession, more than double the efforts we did on target. We were well and truly beaten and very much deserved to be so. Apart from a 10 minute spell after we scored we were once again fucking awful at the back and toothless up front.
__________________
'The big problem with daft quotes on the internet is you have no way of telling if they are genuine or not.' - Winston Churchill (1945)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 AM.
|