 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Register and logon to remove this advert
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
7th July 2011, 05:47 PM
|
#1 |
|
Striker
Join Date: Apr 2006
|
Did Sky Sports show us as having spent £60m....
Just caught the tail end of it......i only make it (roughly, and as it stands) about £22m.....less the Henderson money that's only a small net outlay. I realise there's no such thing as a free transfer and there are agents to pay but surely Sky only count the actual fees.
__________________
This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time. |
|
|
7th July 2011, 05:49 PM
|
#2 |
|
Striker
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
Re: Did Sky Sports show us as having spent £60m....
16mil.
__________________
===== @SAFCsource ===== |
|
|
|
7th July 2011, 05:50 PM
|
#3 |
|
Striker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: smoggie land
|
Re: Did Sky Sports show us as having spent £60m....
Because of the undisclosed fee for one of the players they said 16 million not 60 million Marra
 |
|
|
|
7th July 2011, 05:58 PM
|
#4 |
|
Striker
Join Date: Apr 2006
|
Re: Did Sky Sports show us as having spent £60m....
Cheers lads.......think i may need to get my lugs syringed
__________________
This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 AM.
