Welbeck

Dominic de Sade · 25th June 2011, 11:54 PM

Was only good for about 6 weeks wasn't he? Shit beforehand & injured afterwards....

The Hooded Claw · 25th June 2011, 11:54 PM

Devastating insight.

Trembaths · 26th June 2011, 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dominic de Sade

Was only good for about 6 weeks wasn't he? Shit beforehand & injured afterwards....

Another fine example of the sterling work done by those under resourced people at Care in the Community

naughtynose · 26th June 2011, 12:40 AM

Another day release i see

The Mighty Mackem · 26th June 2011, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dominic de Sade

Was only good for about 6 weeks wasn't he? Shit beforehand & injured afterwards....

didnt hit the ground running but having said that he was played in a position he was not used to playing. He found his stride as was argubly our best player in that spell. Unlucky with an injury and probably never was 100% fit after that.

wakey wakey · 26th June 2011, 09:10 AM

I said all along had more bad games than good games,the chelsea game was the one that seemed to make people think he was better than what he is.

king crab · 26th June 2011, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trembaths

Another fine example of the sterling work done by those under resourced people at Care in the Community

jhs2 · 26th June 2011, 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wakey wakey

I said all along had more bad games than good games,the chelsea game was the one that seemed to make people think he was better than what he is.

Fuck off man. Yay are clueless anarl.

Abu Dhabi Red and White · 26th June 2011, 09:37 AM

What was his goals to games ratio with us?

LRC · 26th June 2011, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abu Dhabi Red and White

What was his goals to games ratio with us?

Considering he was played out of position most games this point is invalid