 |
|
|
|
1st May 2010, 04:37 PM
|
#1 |
|
Striker
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: sunderland
|
portsmouth
are clearly so much better than their league position shows
__________________
Old division 1 winners: 1891/1892 1892/1893 1894/1895 1901/1902 1912/1913 1935/1936 Football League Championship winners: 2004/2005 FA Cup winners: 1936/1937 1972/1973 Charity Shield winners: 1901/1902 1936/1937 |
|
|
1st May 2010, 04:45 PM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
|
Re: portsmouth
No, they aren't
|
|
1st May 2010, 04:45 PM
|
#3 |
|
Striker
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Re: portsmouth
Avram Grant is
__________________
"Please don't call me arrogant, but I'm the best poster on pure football and I think I'm a special one," |
|
|
|
1st May 2010, 04:45 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Guest
|
Re: portsmouth
Quote:
|
|
|
1st May 2010, 04:55 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Striker
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Re: portsmouth
Quote:
__________________
Logged. |
|
|
|
|
1st May 2010, 05:04 PM
|
#6 |
|
Winger
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chilton
|
Re: portsmouth
Still would of been relegated last week
__________________
Aye but Cahill is a freak he can leap higher than the average man. I think he's been interbread with a fucking Kangaroo |
|
|
|
1st May 2010, 05:20 PM
|
#7 |
|
Striker
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Re: portsmouth
On a similar note, does anyone know if Portsmouth will lose points next season instead, as they would have been relegated without the deduction?
__________________
Logged. |
|
|
|
1st May 2010, 05:28 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Striker
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Southwick
|
Re: portsmouth
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
1st May 2010, 05:29 PM
|
#9 | ||
|
Striker
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Re: portsmouth
Quote:
Quote:
Admittedly on the evidence of last week they would deserve to be above Hull |
||
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 AM.
