RTG Sunderland  Message Boards    
 
  • www.readytogo.net
  • www.a-love-supreme.com

  • Go Back   RTG Sunderland Message Boards > Photography Corner > Photography discussion

    Notices

    Register and logon to remove this advert

    Closed Thread
     
    Thread Tools Display Modes
    Old 7th November 2009, 11:09 AM   #1
    The Ghost of ORR
    Midfield
     
     
    Join Date: Jun 2005
    Default FAO photography people

    Been after a DSLR for a little while now and have seen a Nikon D50 used for £180 in town, body only but is that a canny price?
    The Ghost of ORR is offline  
    Old 7th November 2009, 11:14 AM   #2
    safc_graeme
    Winger
     
     
    Join Date: Jul 2005
    Location: Sunderland
    Default Re: FAO photography people

    pics?
    safc_graeme is online now  
    Old 7th November 2009, 12:54 PM   #3
    mad maxim
    Full Back
     
     
    Join Date: Feb 2004
    Location: Sunderland
    Default Re: FAO photography people

    Decent enough "old" (all of 4 years) camera, good reputation for reliability. As long as its in decent condition that's an ok price. (Looked on ebay and they've been going for £150-£250, so in a shop £180's decent)
    mad maxim is offline  
    Old 7th November 2009, 01:32 PM   #4
    not spavin
    Striker
     
     
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Default Re: FAO photography people

    That's a good price, but tbh I'd hang on and save for something a bit newer. Plus, you'll be looking at least £100 for a decent lens. A decent lens is probably more important than a decent body.

    If I were you I'd keep your eye out for a second hand set - maybe something like a D80 - with a couple of lenses, bag, tripod etc. People are always upgrading so they're fairly easy to pick up.

    They're still expensive, but if you see a decent price D90, get it. I upgraded from a D40 to a D2X - I got it second hand, but a couple years ago the D2X was about £4k. The D90 is under a grand brand new and is just as good - arguably better.
    __________________
    Gannin alang the Scotswood Road, to punch some horses' faces.
    not spavin is offline  
    Old 7th November 2009, 02:43 PM   #5
    The Ghost of ORR
    Midfield
     
     
    Join Date: Jun 2005
    Default Re: FAO photography people

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by not spavin View Post
    That's a good price, but tbh I'd hang on and save for something a bit newer. Plus, you'll be looking at least £100 for a decent lens. A decent lens is probably more important than a decent body.

    If I were you I'd keep your eye out for a second hand set - maybe something like a D80 - with a couple of lenses, bag, tripod etc. People are always upgrading so they're fairly easy to pick up.

    They're still expensive, but if you see a decent price D90, get it. I upgraded from a D40 to a D2X - I got it second hand, but a couple years ago the D2X was about £4k. The D90 is under a grand brand new and is just as good - arguably better.
    As I was saying around £200 was my ideal price but if it was something that would last longer around £300 would be fine I imagine.

    I think there's a D80 set in the same shop in town for £380 iirc, a little out of my price range but it had everything I'd need I think.

    I popped in Jessops after and the entry level Canon 1000D was just under £400.
    The Ghost of ORR is offline  
    Old 9th November 2009, 09:32 AM   #6
    not spavin
    Striker
     
     
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Default Re: FAO photography people

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by The Ghost of ORR View Post
    As I was saying around £200 was my ideal price but if it was something that would last longer around £300 would be fine I imagine.

    I think there's a D80 set in the same shop in town for £380 iirc, a little out of my price range but it had everything I'd need I think.

    I popped in Jessops after and the entry level Canon 1000D was just under £400.
    The D50 is absolutely fine, but I'd try and get hold of a D70 or higher if you can. The D40 / 50 / 60 are all great little cameras that will produce smashing pictures, but they are lacking one or two features that will annoy you after a while. The main one is autofocus - older lenses won't autofocus on these cameras, which means that you're slightly limited in terms of what second hand lenses you can buy. Not a massive deal mind you, but definitely worth paying an extra few quid for.

    Whatever you buy, just make sure you've enough left over to buy a good lens. The standard lens for smaller Nikons is the Nikon 18-55 II - you should be able to get one for around £100. It's a smashing lens that'll do most things you need.
    __________________
    Gannin alang the Scotswood Road, to punch some horses' faces.
    not spavin is offline  
    Old 9th November 2009, 09:44 AM   #7
    DonkeyScabs
    Midfield
     
     
    Join Date: Jan 2004
    Location: Octopus's Garden
    Default Re: FAO photography people

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by not spavin View Post
    The D50 is absolutely fine, but I'd try and get hold of a D70 or higher if you can. The D40 / 50 / 60 are all great little cameras that will produce smashing pictures, but they are lacking one or two features that will annoy you after a while. The main one is autofocus - older lenses won't autofocus on these cameras, which means that you're slightly limited in terms of what second hand lenses you can buy. Not a massive deal mind you, but definitely worth paying an extra few quid for.

    Whatever you buy, just make sure you've enough left over to buy a good lens. The standard lens for smaller Nikons is the Nikon 18-55 II - you should be able to get one for around £100. It's a smashing lens that'll do most things you need.
    I have a Nikon D90 now, and that upgrade path is exactly the one I took. The D40 is a good camera, but I quickly found myself wanting to do things that the camera wasn't capable of. The D90 has many features of a camera double it's price. It also comes with a decent zoom lens and the ability to record digital video, although I haven't used that much as yet.
    __________________
    When the world slips you a Jeffrey, stroke the furry wall
    DonkeyScabs is offline  
    Old 9th November 2009, 11:39 AM   #8
    DrNo!
    Midfield
     
     
    Join Date: Mar 2006
    Location: Positively 4th Street
    Default Re: FAO photography people

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by not spavin View Post
    The D50 is absolutely fine, but I'd try and get hold of a D70 or higher if you can. The D40 / 50 / 60 are all great little cameras that will produce smashing pictures, but they are lacking one or two features that will annoy you after a while. The main one is autofocus - older lenses won't autofocus on these cameras, which means that you're slightly limited in terms of what second hand lenses you can buy. Not a massive deal mind you, but definitely worth paying an extra few quid for.

    Whatever you buy, just make sure you've enough left over to buy a good lens. The standard lens for smaller Nikons is the Nikon 18-55 II - you should be able to get one for around £100. It's a smashing lens that'll do most things you need.
    The D50 has the Autofocus motor so you can use all the old Nikon lenses. I would prefer one of these over a D70 to be honest. The D70 really is old ( ancient menu system and tiny rear lcd ) .
    __________________
    Just like The Four Tops......I can't help myself :-(
    DrNo! is offline  
    Old 9th November 2009, 11:44 AM   #9
    not spavin
    Striker
     
     
    Join Date: Oct 2004
    Default Re: FAO photography people

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by DrNo! View Post
    The D50 has the Autofocus motor so you can use all the old Nikon lenses. I would prefer one of these over a D70 to be honest. The D70 really is old ( ancient menu system and tiny rear lcd ) .
    Does it? Didn't realise. That's a good buy at £180 then. Some of the best pictures I've ever took were on my D40, the entry level Nikons are great.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by DonkeyScabs View Post
    I have a Nikon D90 now, and that upgrade path is exactly the one I took. The D40 is a good camera, but I quickly found myself wanting to do things that the camera wasn't capable of. The D90 has many features of a camera double it's price. It also comes with a decent zoom lens and the ability to record digital video, although I haven't used that much as yet.
    I bought a second hand D2X instead of getting a D90. While the D2X is built like a tank, the D90 is every bit as good at most things plus it's loads lighter. I had my D2X with a 18-200 lens stuck to the front of it on holiday, and it's a total fuck on to carry.
    __________________
    Gannin alang the Scotswood Road, to punch some horses' faces.
    not spavin is offline  
    Old 9th November 2009, 12:59 PM   #10
    The Ghost of ORR
    Midfield
     
     
    Join Date: Jun 2005
    Default Re: FAO photography people

    What's best then:

    a) D50 for £180 then get a 18-55m lens for around £100?

    b) Canon 1000D with 18-55m lens for £399 from Jessops.
    The Ghost of ORR is offline  
    Sponsored Links
    Closed Thread

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off

    Forum Jump


    All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin
    Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Copyright © Ready To Go 1998-2013
    Page generated in 0.08914 seconds with 12 queries

    Partially Powered By Products Found At Lampwrights.com