Without not winning for 14 games

[winlatonblackcat]

Where would we be in the table? Top 6 I would guess but cannot be bothered to work it out.

[Hulkster]

If we'd won every game we'd have had a decent chance of winning the league anarl.

[Andy.SAFC]

Originally Posted by winlatonblackcat

Where would we be in the table? Top 6 I would guess but cannot be bothered to work it out.

If we had won all 14 of them, then probably top

[ht1556]

We were averaging about 1.5 points a game so we'd have about 54 points altogether.

[winlatonblackcat]

54 points, so about 8th up there with Everton. Something to aim for next season.

[SedgefieldMackem]

If we'd won all the games we didn't win, we would be champions.

Sorry if the facts scare you.

[Andy.SAFC]

A more relevant fact is that had we not conceded all the stupid goals we did in the last 10 minutes in that 14 game run, then we would have been 6th.

[joedurham]

Originally Posted by winlatonblackcat

Where would we be in the table? Top 6 I would guess but cannot be bothered to work it out.

I posted this last week




If you take S'land's results from August to the Arsenal game ( 1 -0) and then our results from 9 march, (Bolton), to now - we have averaged 1.66666 points per game in the best part of our season ( 21 games). If you multiply by 38 ( total nº of games) you get 63 points.

That would put us 5/6th depending on our goal average vs citeh

The stats do not take into account todays win.




Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthr...#ixzz0m5V1PeGr

[Mackemansj1]

Them shit games at home that ended in draws too, bruce is right its a what if season.

Originally Posted by Andy.SAFC

A more relevant fact is that had we not conceded all the stupid goals we did in the last 10 minutes in that 14 game run, then we would have been 6th.

No we wouldnt.
We would have had 50 points and been above brum but below everton.
We gave away late goals ( last 10 minutes ) against pompey twice and everton once in that 14 game run.