probably seb but
Logon or register to see this image
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...mother-wants-NHS-pay-weight-loss-surgery.htmlAlways said a lot of people are "fatter" due to litre bottles of coke they consume during the day. Lass at work paggers it and she's like a house end, plus it destroys your teeth. I personally can't stand the the stuff as it tastes like a can of sugar.
Why aye, NHS pays for it and she'll go straight back on it after. Drinking that much red bull I'm suprise she is that fat, u thought you WoD be bouncing off the walls.
Some of it's fair enough but I hate pointless associations like #4. 'Same way heroine works' so fuck? So is bucking. So is stroking a beloved family pet. Activation of dopamine receptors in and of itself is not a bad thing purely because that's also how a particular drug works.
Haven't you ever wondered why pure caffeine powder is so plentiful online, basically gives a similar although not ultimately as good effect when sniffed with drink. So I hear like and probably not exactly safe.Similar things happen when you sniff it actually.....
tremendous
It's still something worth being aware of imo, my eyes actually water when I drink coke cause I enjoy it that much, particularly when dehydratedSome of it's fair enough but I hate pointless associations like #4. 'Same way heroine works' so fuck? So is bucking. So is stroking a beloved family pet. Activation of dopamine receptors in and of itself is not a bad thing purely because that's also how a particular drug works.
It's still something worth being aware of imo, my eyes actually water when I drink coke cause I enjoy it that much, particularly when dehydrated
It absolutely is. Fact.It absolutely isn't. It's unhelpful and misleading, likening all of the many good things which are associated with that particular biochemical pathway to dangerous drugs.
It's exactly the sort of nonsense that leads scientifically illiterate idiots to come out with shite like 'I won't eat anything with chemicals in it.'
It's absolutely nowt like but people like a scare storySo much nonsense but I'll just go with the caffeine one. Once you become habituated, the diuretic properties are a non issue. Besides, I doubt regular coca-cola has that much caffeine in anyway
It absolutely is. Fact.
I think a profit driven business would without much thought produce an addictive product within the law if they knew how to.
It's a tenuous attempt to dramatise what coke is but still is made to activate reward receptors, it's just not harmful unless it's all you consumed or somethingReward is incredibly easy to stimulate. Sugar does it, fat does it, salt does it, caffeine does it. Tenuously linking that to a class A drug is ludicrous and also simplifies the effects the class A has on the body (as far as I'm aware cola doesn't activate opioid receptors).
It's unhelpful as far as scientific literacy goes.
Eh? Of course it would fitTry fitting ten teaspoons of sugar into a can of coke. It's complete horseshit man.
Eh? Of course it would fit
Ok now what? A can of Coke would probably hold 100 teaspoons of sugarThink of the full picture Philip.
Until people are going homeless and sucking cock for a can of coke, you can't conpare it to heroin