I
InterPete
Guest
To make sure you'd link to the page and get a few pennies from adclick. Which they managed to pull through.Why would they make a statement?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To make sure you'd link to the page and get a few pennies from adclick. Which they managed to pull through.Why would they make a statement?
Again: THE NORTHERN ECHO UNDERSTANDS blablabla.
No official statement whatsoever from Sunderland...
How on earth would that count as an "official statement"?"with Dick Advocaat set to confirm a decision on his future after Sunday’s final game at Chelsea"
Are you on glue?To make sure you'd link to the page and get a few pennies from adclick. Which they managed to pull through.
Untrue from what I have read over the last 9 months since the loan signing.Well as we used to say in good ole Latin times: verba volant, scripta manent (i.e. words fly, written things stay)!
It would seem however that Sunderland wanted to buy the player and that the one year loan was simply a "delay/safety measure" to make sure the deal wouldn't turn out to be pointless for both Sunderland and Ricky in case of relegation.
not like they'd do that during the season anyway... face it he's going back to inter.Again: THE NORTHERN ECHO UNDERSTANDS blablabla.
No official statement whatsoever from Sunderland...
Read where? Heard from whom?Untrue from what I have read over the last 9 months since the loan signing.
Since our director of football said "the only condition for the deal to become permanent is Sunderland avoiding relegation",I was wondering whether anyone from Sunderland said something,or there is just pure newspaper speculation.
Again: THE NORTHERN ECHO UNDERSTANDS blablabla.
No official statement whatsoever from Sunderland...
You have to go back to January statements and last Summers statements it was clearly disputed in the paper right after Ricky signed. Both sides have been arguing about this matter. I am sure there will be more to follow and I am very confident Inter will get there player back.Read where? Heard from whom?
Again, is there any link pointing at statements done by members of the board where they *clearly* mention the absence of the aforementioned clause or the presence of other ones?
No no no, git posh one on the village green.Sadly none of them relating to football
Give owa.
Bet that's what the rest of us call Domino Pizza
fcinter1908.it/copertina/ausilio-alvarez-solo-una-clausola-bona-vi-spiego-la-formula-jonathan-i-rinnovi-138473Still waiting for a link to this official Inter statement regarding Alvarez...
Huh,who doesn't trust The Sun and the likes.I'd rather 'trust' the word of an English newspaper than that of Italian official.
Huh,who doesn't trust The Sun and the likes.
Ricky will not be a Sunderland player more bad news for Inter I am afraid.A couple of remakrs:
- please do not be angry at us! it's been a shite season and the money from the Ricky deal might be the tiniest blip of an enjoyment we might have seen all year
- 11mlnE for Alvarez ain't too bad. Think that you're black and white (ugly colors btw) neighbours have spend a 25mlnE combined for Martins,Emre and Santon! They're still coming up ahead in the "let's see who spends the most for the worst Inter Milan players!" NE England regional derby!
thats dated from 15/02/2015 so at that point he could have played the requisite number of games to trigger the buy clause, as we know he didn't so its ciao rickyfcinter1908.it/copertina/ausilio-alvarez-solo-una-clausola-bona-vi-spiego-la-formula-jonathan-i-rinnovi-138473
Huh,who doesn't trust The Sun and the likes.
The deal was signed in 2014.thats dated from 15/02/2015