David Warner

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can't seriously believe that? Cuckoo land

You said "no-one walks any more". Utter cack that five minutes of Googling would have refuted.

Another one at World Cup 2011: Jacques Kallis asked Matt Prior if he caught it cleanly and walked on his say so.

And "very very very few did in the past". Nonsense. Can you remember much cricket before 2000?

If you stopped talking in hyperbole we might have a sensible discussion.
 


You said "no-one walks any more". Utter cack that five minutes of Googling would have refuted.

Another one at World Cup 2011: Jacques Kallis asked Matt Prior if he caught it cleanly and walked on his say so.

And "very very very few did in the past". Nonsense. Can you remember much cricket before 2000?

If you stopped talking in hyperbole we might have a sensible discussion.

You sound like a spoilt teenager here like, if you want to just shout people down to suit your argument, go for it
 
Ha'way Muchy man! Aggers might be a friend of the ECB but to say he's an awful commentator is insane. He's the voice of TMS, that itself automatically makes him class. I take it you've never played Brian Lara Cricket for the Play Station?! :lol:

Cannot stand the bloke to be honest. Opinions eh?
 
Warner is as thick as ten planks basically, really dense fella, has embarrassed us a number of times with his antics.

But he's like any elite sportsman, as long as he's getting the job done they'll find excuses to forgive him.

His worst effort lately was all his shit in the wake of Hughes' death about how PH would be with him whenever he stepped out and he'd play in his honour. Well he hasn't, this isn't the way Hughes played the game.
 
Its not cheating though

The rules say the umpire makes the decision, you don't do his job for him, you aren't saying you didn't hit it, just waiting for the umpire to make a decision

It is the same as a defender fouling a striker in the penalty area, then pretending he got the ball. Is he cheating my not telling the ref its a pen? Of course not, its totally down to the umpire.

Nobody in the game walks.
Warners a cxnt but not walking is not cheating.
Do bowlers turn round when they pick up a dodgy appeal and go " ah sorry umps, I was just getting excited he never hit it " ,or " actually this is bit embarrassing umps I could see all three stumps call him back" do the wickys go " nah forget it umps he was in his ground" ?
Do they shite :lol::lol: . Then you help em more by walking off on a tickle? Not likely.
If all the dodgy " cheating"( chancing ? ) appealing stopped I might think about it , until then , " swings and roundabouts" doesn't begin to even it out. Not walking is equal chancing not cheating .
As long as you take the rough with the smooth and don't cry like a bitch when you get the howlers that is.
 
Warners a cxnt but not walking is not cheating.
Do bowlers turn round when they pick up a dodgy appeal and go " ah sorry umps, I was just getting excited he never hit it " ,or " actually this is bit embarrassing umps I could see all three stumps call him back" do the wickys go " nah forget it umps he was in his ground" ?
Do they shite :lol::lol: . Then you help em more by walking off on a tickle? Not likely.
If all the dodgy " cheating"( chancing ? ) appealing stopped I might think about it , until then , " swings and roundabouts" doesn't begin to even it out. Not walking is equal chancing not cheating .
As long as you take the rough with the smooth and don't cry like a bitch when you get the howlers that is.

I know

I am old school though, I don't want DRS, for me the appeal has always been part of trying to get a wicket, a good appeal sometimes mess the umpire raise his finger. Loses some of its drama with DRS, I am not particularly bothered if the umpire makes the odd mistake, it happens
 
You can't seriously believe that? Cuckoo land


You Sir, are a cheat! You edge it you walk.... simple really, you don't your a cheat. Now if you said you weren't sure and were asking the umpire, no problem. If you know you have hit the ball and it is caught then you are out and its on your honour to walk. Just ask NCB how much stick he got for not walking

If you can stand by and break the spirit of the game by cheating then you need to take up football or hockey or darts and leave this great game to people who play by the spirit and code of the game.

I would welcome you to the crease by reminding the whole field, "we're gonna need to bowl him lads cos if he takes the leather off the ball he won't walk" and pretty much I'd ask you if you hit every ball even the ones that went for six, I then ask why you wouldn't walk when edging one" You would bite in the end because you know you have cheated the game.
 
You Sir, are a cheat! You edge it you walk.... simple really, you don't your a cheat. Now if you said you weren't sure and were asking the umpire, no problem. If you know you have hit the ball and it is caught then you are out and its on your honour to walk. Just ask NCB how much stick he got for not walking

If you can stand by and break the spirit of the game by cheating then you need to take up football or hockey or darts and leave this great game to people who play by the spirit and code of the game.

I would welcome you to the crease by reminding the whole field, "we're gonna need to bowl him lads cos if he takes the leather off the ball he won't walk" and pretty much I'd ask you if you hit every ball even the ones that went for six, I then ask why you wouldn't walk when edging one" You would bite in the end because you know you have cheated the game.
Beautiful. Then we had some ginger ale, congratulated our victors with bats under arm and got the jolly old steam train home.
 
Beautiful. Then we had some ginger ale, congratulated our victors with bats under arm and got the jolly old steam train home.

You fail to see the simplicity, if you know your playing a bunch of cheating kernts and let the umpire know, then you may get the benefit of any doubt. If you are known as someone who will walk, the umpire may and usually does give you the benefit when you aren't sure. I play hard, I sledge, and I push the rules as much as anyone. I am embarrassed by bad appealing when its obviously not out, but claiming catches that don't carry and not walking for huge edges is simply cheating.

An example as a chap who is known to play hard and fair, batting well the batsman is not aware that the keeper has crept up to the stumps as the bowler is running in. Plays and misses a shot he wouldn't play when the keeper was known to be up and is given out by the umpire...the batsmen turns to the young lad keeping and says it's usually good form to advise the batsman you're moving up. 1st slip pipes up and says I told him to do it. As the batsman is walking off saying that was poor form, the opposing Captain recalls him.

I got 70 odd that game and got a tiny edge. The umpire gave not out, but I walked. Then they bat and two lads walk in a similar way after faint edges and we won. It had been a bit tense but by being nice and saying that was bad form I got a second chance to bat on and turned a heated nasty game into a hard and fair game.

Yes I'm aware that won't happen all the time, but that imo is how to play the game well! If you expect people to cheat you cheat. If people see honesty, most/all decent people will play the same way.

So no ginger beer that day and cricket and my team won.......I left in a Saab, don't do public transport :)
 
You fail to see the simplicity, if you know your playing a bunch of cheating kernts and let the umpire know, then you may get the benefit of any doubt. If you are known as someone who will walk, the umpire may and usually does give you the benefit when you aren't sure. I play hard, I sledge, and I push the rules as much as anyone. I am embarrassed by bad appealing when its obviously not out, but claiming catches that don't carry and not walking for huge edges is simply cheating.

An example as a chap who is known to play hard and fair, batting well the batsman is not aware that the keeper has crept up to the stumps as the bowler is running in. Plays and misses a shot he wouldn't play when the keeper was known to be up and is given out by the umpire...the batsmen turns to the young lad keeping and says it's usually good form to advise the batsman you're moving up. 1st slip pipes up and says I told him to do it. As the batsman is walking off saying that was poor form, the opposing Captain recalls him.

I got 70 odd that game and got a tiny edge. The umpire gave not out, but I walked. Then they bat and two lads walk in a similar way after faint edges and we won. It had been a bit tense but by being nice and saying that was bad form I got a second chance to bat on and turned a heated nasty game into a hard and fair game.

Yes I'm aware that won't happen all the time, but that imo is how to play the game well! If you expect people to cheat you cheat. If people see honesty, most/all decent people will play the same way.

So no ginger beer that day and cricket and my team won.......I left in a Saab, don't do public transport :)
I failed to see the simplicity? My post is about loving the simplicity. We all want simplicity. And what's wrong with ginger beer?
 
You fail to see the simplicity, if you know your playing a bunch of cheating kernts and let the umpire know, then you may get the benefit of any doubt. If you are known as someone who will walk, the umpire may and usually does give you the benefit when you aren't sure. I play hard, I sledge, and I push the rules as much as anyone. I am embarrassed by bad appealing when its obviously not out, but claiming catches that don't carry and not walking for huge edges is simply cheating.

An example as a chap who is known to play hard and fair, batting well the batsman is not aware that the keeper has crept up to the stumps as the bowler is running in. Plays and misses a shot he wouldn't play when the keeper was known to be up and is given out by the umpire...the batsmen turns to the young lad keeping and says it's usually good form to advise the batsman you're moving up. 1st slip pipes up and says I told him to do it. As the batsman is walking off saying that was poor form, the opposing Captain recalls him.

I got 70 odd that game and got a tiny edge. The umpire gave not out, but I walked. Then they bat and two lads walk in a similar way after faint edges and we won. It had been a bit tense but by being nice and saying that was bad form I got a second chance to bat on and turned a heated nasty game into a hard and fair game.

Yes I'm aware that won't happen all the time, but that imo is how to play the game well! If you expect people to cheat you cheat. If people see honesty, most/all decent people will play the same way.

So no ginger beer that day and cricket and my team won.......I left in a Saab, don't do public transport :)
There's a breathless hush in the close tonight......

I failed to see the simplicity? My post is about loving the simplicity. We all want simplicity. And what's wrong with ginger beer?
Simple , the umpire gives you out or not. It's all the rest of the schoolboy bullshit that's complicated ;)
 
You fail to see the simplicity, if you know your playing a bunch of cheating kernts and let the umpire know, then you may get the benefit of any doubt. If you are known as someone who will walk, the umpire may and usually does give you the benefit when you aren't sure. I play hard, I sledge, and I push the rules as much as anyone. I am embarrassed by bad appealing when its obviously not out, but claiming catches that don't carry and not walking for huge edges is simply cheating.

An example as a chap who is known to play hard and fair, batting well the batsman is not aware that the keeper has crept up to the stumps as the bowler is running in. Plays and misses a shot he wouldn't play when the keeper was known to be up and is given out by the umpire...the batsmen turns to the young lad keeping and says it's usually good form to advise the batsman you're moving up. 1st slip pipes up and says I told him to do it. As the batsman is walking off saying that was poor form, the opposing Captain recalls him.

I got 70 odd that game and got a tiny edge. The umpire gave not out, but I walked. Then they bat and two lads walk in a similar way after faint edges and we won. It had been a bit tense but by being nice and saying that was bad form I got a second chance to bat on and turned a heated nasty game into a hard and fair game.

Yes I'm aware that won't happen all the time, but that imo is how to play the game well! If you expect people to cheat you cheat. If people see honesty, most/all decent people will play the same way.

So no ginger beer that day and cricket and my team won.......I left in a Saab, don't do public transport :)

Don't agree in the slightest, it is not cheating and never will be, the umpire has to give you out, and now with DRS it will happen anyway

If it was a vital point in the Ashes, and you walked after getting a slight nick despite the umpire not giving you out, should be shot with shit.
 
the difference between the rules and the spirit of the game.


and you would need to get your shit gun out if I knew I'd hit it. If I wasn't sure I would go with the umpire.

You are of course completely correct about the rules of the game apart from:

4. The Spirit of the Game involves RESPECT for:

Your opponents

Your own captain

The roles of the umpires

The game's traditional values

5. It is against the Spirit of the Game:

To dispute an umpire's decision by word, action or gesture

To direct abusive language towards an opponent or umpire

To indulge in cheating or any sharp practice, for instance:

(a) to appeal knowing that the batsman is not out

(b) to advance towards an umpire in an aggressive manner when appealing

(c) to seek to distract an opponent either verbally or by harassment with persistent clapping or unnecessary noise under the guise of enthusiasm and motivation of one's own side

I would consider not to walk when knowing you have hit it, to be a sharp practice. But if you can live with it then that is your prerogative. Mine would be to consider you a cheat. We won't agree to agree so we shouldn't carry it further.
 
People are missing the point here for me. As per the definition of the word cheating, both edging it and not walking, and a bowler appealing for an LBW he KNOWS is not out, constitute cheating. Nobody is trying to say it doesn't go on, and you all have clear views as to whether it is acceptable or not.

But 100%, if you are claiming something has happened which you KNOW didnt (ie. Not admitting to an edge, Appealing for an LBW when you know it is sliding down) then you are a cheat. Plain and simple.
 
People are missing the point here for me. As per the definition of the word cheating, both edging it and not walking, and a bowler appealing for an LBW he KNOWS is not out, constitute cheating. Nobody is trying to say it doesn't go on, and you all have clear views as to whether it is acceptable or not.

But 100%, if you are claiming something has happened which you KNOW didnt (ie. Not admitting to an edge, Appealing for an LBW when you know it is sliding down) then you are a cheat. Plain and simple.
A batsman is claiming nothing , he's not even being asked, you don't ask a batsman to leave, the umpire is asked to adjudicate by appeal as indeed he must be by law . If a bat walks without an upheld appeal to the umpire he is technically " retired " , not given out . The umpire decides in and out on every occasion. Just saying like ;)
 
A batsman is claiming nothing , he's not even being asked, you don't ask a batsman to leave, the umpire is asked to adjudicate by appeal as indeed he must be by law . If a bat walks without an upheld appeal to the umpire he is technically " retired " , not given out . The umpire decides in and out on every occasion. Just saying like ;)
You know if you've cheated or not tho. Its just whether you can accept it/live with it or not.

I wouldn't feel right being fairly caught at slip and playing on just cos the umpire missed it. Might make me daft but there ye gan. I'd also own up if a ball fell short and the umpire gave it out.
 
You know if you've cheated or not tho. Its just whether you can accept it/live with it or not.

I wouldn't feel right being fairly caught at slip and playing on just cos the umpire missed it. Might make me daft but there ye gan. I'd also own up if a ball fell short and the umpire gave it out.
To each his own mate . Defending your wicket by all means technically within the laws is one thing, I can put up with that for its bloody minded commitment, as I said I would expect such a man to also walk off without complaint when he gets the bad one. Falsely claiming a catch is another thing , the umpire directly asks the fielder whether it carried, if he lies he's cheated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top