Aye it looks great but you can walk round it in 5 minutes. There is nothing interesting in there.
None of which interests me. Stained glass is not "fascinating" at all. It's just glass painted that anyone could do.
Really?
You would suggest going to Vinderlander or Durham Cathedral on a lads day out?
No. Probably the most impressive room I have been in was the Sistine Chapel. Now that pisses all over the inside of DC and tbh so did Raphael's living quarters.
You've never been out of Peterlee man
you mean there's not
Conveniently left 'or family' off that sentence there mate!Aye it looks great but you can walk round it in 5 minutes. There is nothing interesting in there.
None of which interests me. Stained glass is not "fascinating" at all. It's just glass painted that anyone could do.
Really?
You would suggest going to Vinderlander or Durham Cathedral on a lads day out?
But you know about it and so do many others, that was the idea behind it.
you mean there's not
No but I never suggested anyone should in the first place.
eh? so what? I don't want to know about it - and I don't find it attractive - I also know about the Eiffel Tower and Whitley Bay - neither of which I would want to visit- I always thought the whole point of a visitor attraction was to attract visitors - ???Yes/No?
But, you know about it even though you don't want to know about it, that is its reason for being, to bring attention to the north east. It's an icon already. Just as the Tyne Bridge is recognised elsewhere so is the Angel of the North. Now, I'm not for one moment saying that I like it but..............................it's there and it's noticed. It's not so much an attraction as an icon for the north east, others might argue that point.
