Muppet madness Home | Profile | Archives | Friends

Just a hintWednesday, September 20, 2006

I don't like grumping about work on here. I always have visions of that La Petite Anglaise chick, who was fired for blogging about work. But anyhoo, I really want to say this, and I'll take them all on if they care.

 

My friend has been made redundant, and truthfully, why, we just do not know. Although a guess can be hazarded, which I doubt is too wide of the mark. And let's just say it's lucky he isn't pursuing constructive dismissal.

 

I blogged a little while ago that it was on the cards, he found out last week. On Monday, it all came to a head, and he decided not to work out his notice, so they let him leave there and then. And that was it. One of my best mates at work has scooted, and the office is a much sadder place (well, apart from some people who are doing cartwheels...). It stinks, and it stinks so much, while the official line is that everyone is a happily bonded team (the CEO breezed in yesterday and said "everyone put yesterday behind us? good good"), we're all looking for new jobs. We are bonded - in disgust at the way our colleague (or ex-colleague now) has been treated.

 

How does it get like this? I detest office politics, but sometimes people seem to be determined to make them desperately unhappy places to work, and right now, I would give anything not to work stuck in one place for 8 hours a day.

Post Comment

there must have been some sort of a reason for itWednesday, September 20, 2006
making roles redundant is sadly just one of the ways to get rid of people easier as dismissal is such a bind. If they can genuinely say the role has been made redandant and dont hire someone to take the same role, then as i recall, they are legally ok. You cant make someone redundant and then hire someone into the same role though. or something.
Posted by hazey

thats right hazeyWednesday, September 20, 2006
although I think you can get round that by say, 'reduceing workload/job requirements and therefore salary' - so its the same sort of role, just less money.

Still wrong like.

Posted by harrygilwood

i don think it is that bad personallyWednesday, September 20, 2006
employers hsould have more powers to bin people off. We work in a more dynamic world and companies need to adapt and do without having to pay people who are shit or whatever. every company ive worked at has had at least a few people who are total wastes of space but they cant do anything to get rid of them (except for redundancy, which is normally what has happened in the end) because of the laws. And to think the french see our employment laws as harsh. in france theres all sorts of rules for binning people off, in certain cases having to pay people for another year after they are made redundant to aid them in searching for work. crackers.
not that im saying your mate was shit or owt muppet, just making a point
Posted by hazey

Mr Gilwood is correctWednesday, September 20, 2006
That's what's happened...

And he definitely wasn't shit.
Posted by Muppet

so why bin him then?Wednesday, September 20, 2006
did he upset his bosses or summat?
Posted by hazey

You may say thatWednesday, September 20, 2006
I couldn't possibly comment.

But I'd hazard a guess that a face didn't fit.
Posted by Muppet

HelloWednesday, September 20, 2006
I'm having a beer with Dilana on Friday evening, if you want a couple of CDs I can get them, just let me know.

Posted by AB22

Entry 3 of 59
Last Page | Next Page
Sign up for a free weblog HERE